Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
Judgment:
This case concerns property alleged by the defendant to have become stool property on the death of Kwame Pong. It is not denied that the property was privately owned by Kwame Pong before he occupied the stool. Defendant contends that it is the custom that all personal properties of a new elected chief are attached to the stool he occupies and became stool property on his death. The members of the "A" Court in their judgment stated that it is the custom that when a person is elected as a Chief he makes a declaration as to which of his private properties he hands over to the stool. There is no evidence that Kwame Pong ever made such declaration concerning the property now in dispute.
Appeal is dismissed with costs to Plaintiff Appellants Respondents to be taxed.