THE REPUBLIC v. THE HIGH COURT (CRIMINAL DIVISION 2) ACCRA; EX PARTE AMINA TAHIRU& ANOR
March 20, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- ADJEI-FRIMPONG JSC
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Criminal Law and Procedure
March 20, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
On May 28, 2024, the High Court (Criminal Division) Accra, in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction gave judgment against the applicant herein concerning a Toyota Vehicle No. GS 1439-21. By its orders, the High Court set aside the decision of the District Court, Achimota concerning the proper party to have custody of the said vehicle.
The dissatisfied applicant desired to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court in the nature of certiorari to have the orders of the High Court on certain grounds, quashed. For this purpose, she initiated an application which came before an ordinary bench of this Court on 28th January. It turned out that the application was not filed within the time prescribed by the rules of this Court. In the end, the application was withdrawn and accordingly struck out. The instant application is to seek extension of time to bring the application. The affidavit in support of the application recounts the reasons for the instant application.
The rules governing the application are contained in Rules 62 and 66 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 (C.I. 16) as amended by the Supreme Court (Amendment) Rules, 1999 (C.I. 24). They are as follows:
62. An application to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court shall be filed within 90 days of the date when the grounds for the application first arose unless the time is extended by the Court.
66. An application for the extension of time within which to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of the Court under Rule 62 shall not be made after the expiration of the three months period within which an application seeking to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction may be filed.
The above provisions lack no clarity in meaning. An applicant who desires to invoke the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court must file his application within 90 days counting from the date when the grounds for the application first arose unless time is extended by the Court. The question is when can an application for extension of time be brought? Rule 66 prescribes that such application shall not be brought after the expiration of 90 days (three months) within which an application invoking the supervisory jurisdiction may be filed. It means that the application for extension must be filed by the time (and not after) the ninety days had expired. This is where the utility of the rule is challenged. In the normal course of events, an application for extension of tim
AI Generated Summary
Justice R. Adjei-Frimpong of the Supreme Court, sitting as a single justice, dismissed an application seeking an extension of time to file a certiorari to quash High Court appellate orders concerning custody of Toyota Vehicle No. GS 1439-21. The High Court (Criminal Division) Accra had, on May 28, 2024, set aside a District Court, Achimota ruling about who should hold the vehicle. The applicant attempted to challenge those orders in the Supreme Court, but her initial application was late, withdrawn, and struck out. She then filed, on January 30, 2025, a motion to extend time. Interpreting Rules 62 and 66 of the Supreme Court Rules (C.I. 16 as amended by C.I. 24), and guided by Pwamang JSCs observations in Republic v High Court, Ho, Ex parte Awuku Dopley, the court held extensions cannot be sought after ninety days from when grounds arose, and the withdrawn application did not pause time. The motion was dismissed.