THE REPUBLIC v. HIGH COURT 3, KOFORIDUA; EX PARTE ERNEST YAW KUMI & 3ORs
March 12, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- PWAMANG JSC (PRESIDING)
- PROF. MENSA-BONSU (MRS.) JSC
- GAEWU JSC
- KWOFIE JSC
- ADJEI-FRIMPONG JSC
March 12, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
On December 7, 2024, the people of Akwatia in the Eastern Region went to the polls to elect, what is of relevance to the instant proceedings, a member of Parliament for the constituency in the general elections. The applicant was a candidate in the elections representing the New Patriotic Party (N.P.P). The 1st Interested Party contested on the ticket of the National Democratic Congress (N.D.C.)
At the close of polls and on counting and collation of results, the Applicant was declared winner by the 2nd Interested Party, the Electoral Commission (E.C.). The EC has since gazetted the results of the constituency parliamentary elections even though in this application, the issue of when this was actually done is in some controversy.
Following the declaration of the results however, the 1st Interested Party on 31st December filed a petition in the High Court Koforidua seeking to challenge the results on grounds of alleged irregularities and misconducts, that to him, affected the final outcome of the elections. The petition sought the following reliefs:
(a)A declaration that the purported declaration of the winner of the parliamentary election held at Tesano Police Training School in Accra on Thursday, the 12th December, 2024 is void and of no legal effect.
(b)An order cancelling the results of the said declaration by agents of the 2nd Respondent.
(c) A declaration that the 1st Respondent was not validly elected as Member of Parliament.
(d) A declaration that upon the cancellation of all unlawful votes and upon proper collation the Petitioner is the validly elected member of parliament for the Akwatia Constituency.
(e)Costs and any order just and fair in the eyes of the law.
On the back of the petition, the 1st Interested Party the same day filed an application ex parte for an interlocutory injunction restraining the Respondents therein from essentially, doing anything to hold the applicant out as a duly elected Member of Parliament. In particular, the Applicant was to be restrained from being called, admitted, registered, sworn in or gazetted as Member of Parliament for that constituency.
Senyo Amedahe J on the 2nd January 2025, granted the ex parte application for a limited period of ten (10) days. The next day 3rd January 2025, the applicant caused an application to be filed in that
AI Generated Summary
This Supreme Court ruling addresses whether Hon. Ernest Yaw Kumi, convicted for contempt by the High Court, Koforidua, may nonetheless be heard on applications invoking the Supreme Court’s supervisory jurisdiction. The background involves the Akwatia parliamentary election, which the Electoral Commission declared for Kumi (NPP), and an election petition by the NDC candidate seeking to void the result, accompanied by ex parte injunctions from Justice Emmanuel Senyo Amedahe. Kumi challenged the High Court’s jurisdiction and sought certiorari and prohibition in the Supreme Court on January 8, 2025, before contempt proceedings were initiated; he was later convicted for disobeying the injunction. The Court, citing Halsbury’s Laws, Arlidge, Eady & Smith, Hadkinson, X Ltd v Morgan-Grampian, Ex parte Kodua, and In re Apenteng, held that the rule against hearing a contemnor is discretionary and subject to exceptions. Applying those principles, the majority found this case falls within the exceptions and granted Kumi audience; PWAMANG JSC dissented, insisting on purge before hearing.