SWISS AFRICAN TRADING CO. LTD. v. ARYEE
March 27, 1961
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- VAN LARE
- SARKODEE-ADOO
- AKIWUMI JJ.S.C
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
March 27, 1961
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF VAN LARE, J.S.C.
Van Lare, J.S.C. delivered the judgment of the court. The appellant in this case was a claimant in an interpleader suit in respect of property attached to be sold in execution of a judgment debt recovered against a brother of his in whose name the conveyance of the property was obtained. The claimant-appellant signed the deed of conveyance as a witness of the transaction. He now comes to court to say that the document he witnessed was in fact a transaction in which he was a joint purchaser of the land. The learned Commissioner of Assize and Civil Pleas decided rightly in our view that the claimant-appellant is estopped from alleging what he now says. That he is an illiterate is no excuse. An illiterate, qua illiterate, cannot be heard to say that he was unaware of the contents of a conveyance executed and witnessed by him in favour of his brother; see Ankamah v. Kitcher1. The instant case is even stronger because the illiterate claimant agrees that he well knew and understood that the conveyance which he signed as a witness was in favour of his brother only.
The learned commissioner applied the law correctly to the facts in this case and we are unable to agree with learned counsel for the claimant-appellant in this court that the learned commissioner was wrong in holding that the property in dispute, that is Plot B. 331/4 Link Road, Accra, is not the joint property of the judgment debtor and the claimant. In the result we dismiss the appeal with costs fixed at £G27. 15s.
DECISION
Appeal dismissed.
AI Generated Summary
This Supreme Court judgment, delivered by Van Lare, J.S.C., arises from an interpleader suit concerning property attached for sale in execution of a judgment debt against the claimant’s brother. The conveyance of the property was taken in the brother’s name, and the claimant-appellant signed the deed as a witness. He later asserted that the transaction he witnessed represented a joint purchase of the land, including Plot B. 331/4 Link Road, Accra. The court held that he was estopped from making this claim, emphasizing that illiteracy provides no excuse to deny knowledge of a conveyance’s contents. The court further found that the claimant-appellant knew and understood the conveyance favored his brother alone. Affirming the Commissioner of Assize and Civil Pleas, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and awarded costs of £G27. 15s.