REPUBLIC v. DIRECTOR OF PRISONS; EX PARTE OHENE-DJAN
November 27, 1978
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- AGYEPONG J
Areas of Law
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Civil Procedure
November 27, 1978
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF AGYEPONG J.
The applicant herein was on 8 August 1975, convicted of manslaughter of an unknown man by the High Court, Accra, presided over by Amissah J.A. sitting as an additional High Court judge, and was on 11 August 1975, sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment with hard labour. At the time of the present application, the applicant was serving his sentence at Ussher Fort Prison, Accra.
The applicant contends that his conviction is null and void and of no effect; consequently his sentence of imprisonment and his incarceration at the Ussher Fort are illegal, and he is therefore entitled to be released under the Habeas Corpus Act, 1964 (Act 244).
[p.398]
In support of his submission that the conviction was a nullity, Mr. Peter Adjetey, learned counsel for the applicant, on 28 June 1978 urged four main grounds: (1) that the applicant did not himself plead guilty to the offence of manslaughter; (2) that the Criminal Procedure Code, 1960 (Act 30), s. 239 (2) under which the applicant was convicted of manslaughter could not in law be invoked by the applicant at the stage the trial had reached, that is, after the close of the case of the prosecution; (3) the court ought to have acquitted the applicant first of the offence of murder before convicting him of the offence of manslaughter; and (4) once the applicant was put in charge of the jury he could not in law be acquitted or convicted except by the verdict of the jury, which was not taken in this case. Learned counsel concluded his submission by contending that the failure of the learned trial judge to comply with these rules of law or procedure amounted to want of jurisdiction.
The history of the case culminating in the conviction and sentence of the applicant is well known: The applicant, a Sunyani legal practitioner, and one Adu Yeboah, were jointly, charged with the murder of an unknown man at Sunyani. They were, however, tried at the High Court, Accra, and as previously stated, it was presided over by Amissah J.A.
On arraignment on 30 July 1975, both accused persons pleaded not guilty and the jury were empanelled for the trial. The prosecution closed its case on 6 August 1975 after calling nineteen witnesses and the case was adjourned to 7 August 1975 for the defence to open. On that adjourned date, 7 August 1975, counsel for the applicant informed the court that his client, the applicant herein, wanted to avail himself of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1960 (Act 30), s. 239 (2) by plea
AI Generated Summary
This High Court judgment by Agyepong J. addresses a habeas corpus application brought by a Sunyani legal practitioner who was convicted of manslaughter in August 1975 by the High Court, Accra, presided over by Amissah J.A., and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. The applicant asserted nullity of his conviction and custody, arguing he did not personally plead guilty to manslaughter, section 239(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code could not be invoked after the prosecution’s case, the court should have acquitted him of murder before convicting him of manslaughter, and once a jury was empanelled only its verdict could convict or discharge him. The judge reviewed the record and tape-recorded proceedings, statutory provisions, and authorities distinguishing jurisdictional nullities from appealable errors. He found the applicant personally entered the guilty plea to manslaughter, section 239(2) could be invoked at that stage, any sequence deviation was immaterial under the Interpretation Act, there was no statutory rule requiring a jury verdict in the circumstances, and habeas corpus is not an appeal. The warrant was valid and custody justified; the application was dismissed.