O. H. REYNARD v. WILL'ARD HAWES & CO.,

LOGAN, J.--It is not disputed that the claimant was carrying on business on behalf of Willard Hawes & Co., but the executioncreditor, in order tu succeed, must establish a good deal more than this. He must show that the claimant's business was Willard Hawes & Co's. business. The claimant says that he was carrying on business for Willard Hawes & Co., also on his own account, and that he conducted Willard Hawes & Co's. business on the premises which he had leased in his own name where he carried on his other work. The lease is in the claimant's name, the cheques for the rent are signed by the claimant in his own name; and he has told the Court that the money came from the goods which he shipped to W. Hawes & Co., and for which he was paid by commission. None of this evidence has been displaced, and, in my opinion, the execution-creditor has failed to show any sufficient ground for attaching the property. The writ of attachment must be raised. Costs to claimant. Costs to be taxed.