NATIONAL INVESTMENT BANK LIMITED vs MIDONAR LIMITED and ORS
July 8, 2025
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE YAA ONYAMEYE GYAKOBO
Areas of Law
- Banking and Finance Law
- Contract Law
July 8, 2025
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
a. An order for the recovery of the sum of GHS1,384,806.60 being the outstanding liability on the facility granted to the 1st Defendant;
b. Interest on the said sum of GHS1,384,806.60 at the prevailing interest rate from 21st November 2019 till date of final payment;
c. Judicial sale of the mortgaged residential property situated and numbered as House NO. ANT/AB 35, North West Achimota, Accra;
d. Judicial sale of the mortgaged property designated as Plot No. 2E, 2nd Market Street, Dansoman, Accra;
e. Costs.
The Plaintiff, a company registered under the laws of Ghana and engaged in the business of banking, pleaded that the 1st Defendant is a registered company and its customer and that the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are directors and guarantors of the facility granted the 1st Defendant.
The Plaintiff also pleaded that the 1st Defendant applied for and was granted a term loan by the Plaintiff in the sum of GHS498,844.83 in May 2014, to run for a period of six months at an interest rate of 30% per annum and that the term loan was to run until 22nd November 2014.
The Plaintiff further pleaded that the facility was secured as follows:
a. Legal mortgage over a residential property situated and numbered as House No. ANT/AB 35, North-West Achimota, Accra;
b. Existing legal mortgage over plot of land designated as Plot No. 2E Second Market Street, Dansoman High Street, Accra; and
c. Joint and several guarantees by the Directors of the company.
Plaintiff further pleaded that the 1st Defendant had defaulted in the terms of repayment since its expiration and that the Guarantors had also failed to pay up the facility and further that by the terms of the various contracts executed, the Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the total sum owed by the 1st Defendant.
It was also the Plaintiff’s pleading that as at 21st November 2019, the 1st Defendant’s total indebtedness stood at GHS1,384,806.60 and that unless compelled by the court, the Defendants would not fulfil their obligations as several attempts to get them to pay up had proved futile. It therefore claimed against the Defendants jointly and severally the reliefs endorsed on the writ of summons stated in paragraph 1 above.
AI Generated Summary
Her Ladyship Justice Yaa Onyameye Gyakobo (JA), sitting as an additional High Court judge, adjudicated a banking loan dispute between a Ghana-registered bank and its customer, a company whose directors (including Michael Kojo Nartey) guaranteed the facility. The bank had restructured a 2013 overdraft into a short-term loan with a raised limit of GHS498,844.83 at 30% per annum, secured by mortgages over properties at Achimota and Dansoman and by guarantees. The bank claimed an outstanding GHS1,384,806.60 and sought judicial sales. The Defendants disputed the accounting and argued repayment hinged on Government payments. The court held that the bank did not prove the higher indebtedness from Exhibit G, but found the restructured loan and guarantees enforceable, awarding GHS498,844.83 with 30% interest from 17 May 2014 and costs of GHS15,000. Judicial sale reliefs failed because the mortgages were not in evidence and mortgagors were not parties, consistent with Ex parte Chinto, and the defendants’ interest-computation allegations were unproven.