MARY EWUDZIE & OTHERS v. ELIZABETH JOHNSON & OTHERS
May 27, 2019
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- MARIAMA OWUSU, JA (PRESIDING)
- S. DZAMEFE, JA
- M. WELBOURNE, JA
May 27, 2019
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
DZAMEFE, JA
This is an appeal from the decision of the High Court, Kumasi dated 25th day of January, 2016.
The plaintiffs/appellants hereinafter simply referred to as the plaintiffs issued a writ of summons against the defendants/respondents, simply defendants, for the following reliefs; -
a. A declaration that plot umber PSU/CIX ASAWASE ESTATE, Kumasi did not form part of the estate of Sampson Mills (deceased) and ought not to be administered as part of his estates.
b. A further declaration that the plaintiffs herein who jointly provided the purchase price for the acquisition of the said plot from the State Housing Corporation Ltd are entitled to the beneficial enjoyment for life of the said property.
FACTS
The plaintiffs in their statement of claim aver they are bakers living in Kumasi while the defendants are the Administrators of the estate of Sampson Mills (deceased). The plaintiff avers that their maternal grandmother, Ama Eyie was the maternal cousin of one Araba Nana. That Ama Eyie begat their mother Hagar Brown while Araba Nana begat the deceased Sampson Mills.
It is the case of the plaintiff’s that, a member of their family by name Madam Sophia York @ Sophia Ansah acquired Plot No.1 Block C Asawase, Kumasi from the State Housing Corporation (SHC). The plaintiff said their mother Madam Hagar Brown lived with the said Madam Sophia York in that house at Asawase.
The plaintiffs aver further that Madam Sophia York was a baker and carried out her business from that house while their mother Hagar Brown and other members of the family assisted her and also learnt the trade from her. Later, in a bid to be independent from Sophia York their mother Hager Brown, together with the defendants’ sister Comfort Mills and one Aba Akoa moved from Sophia’s house onto the parcel of land now in dispute and erected their own ovens and baked bread. This they said was in the middle of the 1970’s when that plot was designated as an “open space”. Other family members followed suit and erected their ovens thereon. Esi Guruba built and later transferred to 3rd plaintiff, Florence Gyasi built and transferred to 4thplaintiff, and 2ndplaintiff built her own oven and all of them worked on this parcel of land in dispute.
According the plaintiffs, the deceased Sampson Mills later joined them on the disputed land with the intention of establishing his aluminium pot business there. Later the deceased brought up the idea, they should apply to State Housing Corporat
AI Generated Summary
Plaintiffs, bakers in Kumasi and maternal relations of the late Sampson Mills, sought declarations that Plot PSU/CIX, Asawase Estate, did not belong to Mills’s estate and that their financial contributions entitled them to beneficial enjoyment. They asserted occupation of the ‘open space’ since the mid‑1970s and said Mills later joined, proposed approaching the State Housing Corporation (SHC), and held the licence (1984) and lease (2005) in his name while plaintiffs paid the GH800 development charge and ground rents. The High Court prioritized documentary proof, finding all official instruments were in Mills’s name, and dismissed the suit. On appeal, the Court of Appeal reheard the case on the omnibus ground and emphasized the presumption of validity of official records, preference for authentic documents over oral testimony, and that long occupation does not ripen into ownership without regularization. Noting plaintiffs’ payments were made in Mills’s name and receipts sent to his nephew, the court held the land was Mills’s self‑acquired property, dismissed the appeal, affirmed the High Court, and granted the administrators’ counterclaim.