KWAKU ANSA-ASARE v. CAL MERCHANT BANK LTD
January 16, 2003
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- LARTEY, JA (PRESIDING)
- AKOTO-BAMFOR, JA.
- AKAMBA, JA
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
January 16, 2003
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
RULING
AKAMBA, J.A.:
This is an application by the Defendant/Appellant/Applicant [herein after simply as Applicant] seeking an order for stay of execution of the judgment of the Accra High Court dated 23rd May 2002 Coram: Agnes Dzordzie (Mrs.) J, pending appeal.
The applicants’ reasons for seeking the stay of execution are that the Respondent would be unable to refund the colossal sum involved should the same be paid to him and the appeal eventually succeeds. Also, the Applicant is of the view that it is economically wise to leave the judgment sum with them to invest same, being a Bank, and to pay it off should their appeal fail. Lastly, the appellant pointed out that his appeal has every chance of succeeding in which event a refund would be unnecessary.
The Respondent vehemently opposed the application contending that not only is the appeal doomed to failure but that he is a man of substance and can refund the total sum in an unlikely event of the appeal succeeding. In addition the Respondent gave an indication of his willingness to give a written undertaking to refund the sum should the Court so desire. Finally the Respondent stressed that he did all the necessary legal work for which he was retained, attaching the property in respect of which he organized two auction sales and therefore properly earned his fee.
In our view the Applicant did not deny that the Respondent did the work for which he was retained as per Exh. 'C'. There appears however to be a dispute as to what amount is payable to the Respondent, but that is an issue to be properly determined when the appeal is heard. What is important here is whether in the event of the appeal succeeding, the Respondent would be in a position to refund the sum involved. From the affidavit evidence and the arguments urged before us we are satisfied that the Respondent is in a position to refund the money should the appeal succeed. Accordingly we hereby refuse the application for stay of execution on the condition that the Respondent deposits with the Registrar of this Court a written undertaking within seven (7) days of this order that he will refund the full amount in the event of the appeal succeeding.
No order as to costs.
J. B. AKAMBA
JUSTICE OF APPEAL
LARTEY, J.A.:
I agree.
AKOTO-BAMFO (MRS):
I also agree.
AI Generated Summary
Akamba, JA delivered a ruling on an interlocutory motion by the Defendant/Appellant/Applicant, a banking institution, for a stay of execution of a judgment of the Accra High Court (Agnes Dzordzie, J.) pending appeal. The Applicant argued that the Respondent could not refund the sizable judgment sum if the appeal succeeded and urged that it was economically prudent for the bank to retain and invest the funds until the appeal concluded, while asserting strong prospects of success. The Respondent opposed, insisting the appeal lacked merit, affirming his capacity to refund, offering a written undertaking to repay, and emphasizing that he had performed the legal work for which he was retained per Exhibit C, including attaching property and organizing two auction sales. The Court noted that the Applicant did not deny the work performed; although the amount payable was disputed, that issue was for the appeal. The decisive question was whether repayment could be made if the appeal succeeded. Satisfied that the Respondent could refund, the Court refused a stay but required a written undertaking to repay, and made no order as to costs.