Gh. Tabati Limited v. Social Security & National Insurance Trust (SSNIT) and Lands Commission
October 17, 2013
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- Owusu M., J.A. (Presiding)
- Marful-Sau, J.A.
- Saeed Gyan, J.A.
October 17, 2013
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
MARIAMA OWUSU, J. A: On 8-4-2011, the High Court, Accra, dismissed the plaintiff’s application for an order to set aside the judgment of the Court dated 14-1-2011. Dissatisfied with the decision of the Court, the plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal on the following grounds: 1. The learned trial Judge failed to exercise his discretion judicially when he refused to grant the application to set aside the judgment of the Court dated 14-1-2011 and restore plaintiff/appellant’s action.
2. That the judgment is against the weight of the evidence.
3. That the learned trial Judge failed to consider the case of the plaintiff/appellant in dismissing the application to set aside the judgment of the Court.
4. Additional grounds of appeal will be filed on receipt of the ruling of the High Court.
The relief sought from the Court of Appeal is for “The reversal of the ruling of the High Court dated 14-1-2011 and the restoration of plaintiff/appellant’s action.
Before dealing with arguments canvassed in support and against this appeal, I would like to give the background to this case.
The Plaintiff/Applicant/Appellant issued out a writ of summons against the defendants jointly and severally for the following reliefs: a. A declaration of title to all that piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being at Ridge, Accra otherwise known as Plot No. 27b, Ambassador Hotel Planning Scheme, Independence Avenue, West Ridge.
b. Recovery of Possession of the said parcel of land c. Damages for trespass thereto.
d. An Order of perpetual injunction restraining the defendants whether by themselves, their servants, agents and privies whosoever from further interference in any manner whatsoever, with the plaintiff’s beneficial ownership and possession of the said parcel of land.
e. Cost, including lawyer’s fees.
f. Further or other relief(s). In the Statement of Claim that accompanied plaintiff’s writ of summons, the latter avers among other things that it is a Private Limited Company registered under the laws of Ghana whilst the defendant is a statutory body and 2nd defendant is the head of the 1st defendant’s institution and responsible for the day to day administration of the 1st defendant.
The plaintiff averred further that by virtue of a Deed of Lease dated 22-12-2006 plotted at the Lands Commission on 31-3-2007 and duly stamped as LVB 6369/07 made between the Government of Ghana, as the Lessor and the plaintiff as the Lessee, the said Lessor demised Plot No. 27B Am
AI Generated Summary
This Court of Appeal judgment, authored by Justice Mariama Owusu, arises from a land dispute at West Ridge, Accra, between a private company and a statutory body (with its head) over Plot No. 27/27B. The plaintiff relied on a government lease (22-12-2006) and a registered Land Title Certificate, alleging trespass by defendants. Defendants claimed an earlier allocation by Lands Commission in 1997, payment, and acts of possession, and accused Lands Commission of fraud; they counterclaimed for declarations, cancellation of plaintiff’s lease and certificate, specific performance, and damages. After plaintiff’s non-attendance, the High Court dismissed the claim under Order 36 r 2(b) and entered judgment on the counterclaim, cancelling plaintiff’s title and ordering a lease to 1st defendant, plus damages and costs. On appeal, the Court of Appeal held service was not proven (contradictory bailiff testimony undermined by documentary evidence), emphasized that documentary evidence prevails over oral testimony, and found Lands Commission was not properly joined because the writ was never amended or served. The Court allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court’s judgment, restored the plaintiff’s claim, and remitted for retrial before a different judge, with no order as to costs.