G. T. ECOLOGICAL FARMS, ACTING v. GAMA OF TERPORSI & ORS
April 27, 2016
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- DENNIS DOMINIC ADJEI, J.A. (PRESIDING)
- CECILIA H. SOWAH, J.A.
- L. L. MENSAH, J.A
April 27, 2016
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
J U D G M E N T:
L. L. MENSAH, J.A.
This is an appeal by the Plaintiff/Appellant who will hereinafter be referred to as the Plaintiff against the judgment of the Circuit Court, Odumase-Krobo dated the 12th day of December 2013 in favour of the Defendants/Respondents who will hereinafter be referred to as Defendants.
On the 3rd of September, 2001, the Plaintiff issued a Writ of Summons and a Statement of Claim against the Defendants with the following reliefs:-
(a) Declaration of Title and Recovery of possession to a parcel of land situate at a place commonly called Brigade near Somanya and bounded as follows: On North by Nohipemi’s land measuring on that side a distance of 1,200 feet more or less, Langma’s land measuring 1708 feet, Dikatey’s land measuring 1477 feet, Kwadwo Okumi’s land measuring 3195 feet, on the East by Kwadwo Okumi’s land measuring 1803 feet; on the South by Brigade’s land measuring 5929 feet more or less and on the West by Kwade’s land measuring 1757 and Nuer Ologo’s land measuring 737 feet.
(b) General Damages for trespass.
(c) Perpetual injunction to restrain the Defendants, their agents, workmen, servants and all persons claiming any interest in the disputed land through them from interfering upon the land described in paragraph 1 (supra).
Upon service of the writ on the Defendants, they denied the claim of the Plaintiff and in their statement of defence counterclaimed as follows:-
1. 1st and 3rd Defendants claim for and on behalf of their respective families a declaration of the title to their respective lands described in their Statement of Defence and 2nd Defendant claims for a Declaration of title of her land described in the Statement of Defence.
2. 1st and 2nd Defendants claim for the payment of ₵1,200,000 (GH₵120.00) and ₵500,000 (GH₵500 (sic) being the value of maize seized respectively.
3. General Damages for trespass.
4. Perpetual injunction against the Plaintiff, his successors, assigns or servants from interfering in the Defendants’ possession of their respective lands described in their statement of defence.
After a full-length trial, the learned trial judge dismissed the case of the Plaintiff and entered judgment for Defendants in their counterclaim with general damages and costs in favour of each Defendant.
It is against this judgment that the Plaintiff launched this appeal.
THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL
The grounds of appeal filed by the Plaintiff are:
1. That the judgment is against the weight of eviden
AI Generated Summary
The Court of Appeal, per L. L. Mensah, J.A., affirmed the Circuit Court’s judgment dismissing the land title suit brought by Plaintiff and upholding Defendants’ counterclaims. Plaintiff alleged a 1998 purchase of approximately 253 acres near Somanya, supported by a site plan and a prior Lands Commission search, and claimed extensive developments and possession. The trial judge found Plaintiff failed to tender any search report, indenture, receipts, or credible site plan evidence, did not call boundary owners or witnesses to the alleged customary rites, and inconsistently identified the acreage. The 1st, 3rd, and 4th Defendants credibly claimed ancestral ownership, and the 2nd Defendant’s 7½-acre purchase was supported by receipts and a witness. Applying appellate standards and land law principles, the Court of Appeal rejected all three grounds (weight of evidence, counterclaim description, and inadequate reasons), and affirmed judgment for Defendants, with Adjei, J.A. (Presiding) and Sowah, J.A. concurring.