EMMANUEL GABI-DAVIES & ANOR VS RICHARD ANUM OFOLI & ANOR
July 31, 2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE BARBARA TETTEH-CHARWAY (MRS)
Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Tort Law
July 31, 2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
The facts of this case are that sometime in 2009, the Plaintiffs, who were looking for a parcel of land, on which to establish a school, approached the Defendants, who offered to sell to them twenty (20) plots of land, situate at Oyarifa in Accra.
At the time of the transaction, a plot of land went for Six Thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ6, 000. 00) and therefore the Plaintiffs were to pay an amount of One Hundred and Twenty Thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ120, 000. 00)for twenty (20) plots of land.
The Plaintiffs accepted the offer and proceeded to pay to the Defendants an amount of Seventy-Seven Thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ77, 000. 00) which, they claim, was the equivalent of thirteen (13) plots of land, leaving a balance of Forty-Three Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH¢43, 000. 00) to be paid upon execution of the conveyance.
Subsequently, the Defendants informed the Plaintiffs that there was litigation over the land they had offered to sell to them and promised to transfer same to the Plaintiffs after the resolution of the dispute.
In the meantime, the Defendants prepared an unsigned lease covering four (4) plots of land which they handed over to the Plaintiffs while awaiting the outcome of the suit.
The Plaintiff’s case is that in spite of the fact that the said dispute was resolved in favour of the Defendants, as far back as, 24th January 2014, the Defendants have failed or refused to fulfil their side of the bargain by conveying the twenty plots of land agreed upon to the Plaintiffs.
Plaintiffs claim that in addition to the Seventy-Seven Thousand Ghana Cedis (GH¢77, 000. 00)they paid to the Defendants they have also made payments of Three Thousand Ghana Cedis(GHȼ3, 000. 00) for survey fees and preparation of documents for the land and expended an amount of One Hundred and Ten thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ110, 000. 00) to purchase a tipper truck, a concrete mixer, iron rods, cement and other building materials in preparation for their school project.
Plaintiffs further claim that the Defendants are seeking to enrich themselves unjustly by taking advantage of the enhanced value of land to sell it at a higher price to another purchaser.
They claim that the current value of the thirteen plots of land they paid for is approximately Three Hundred and Ninety Thousand Ghana Cedis (GHȼ390, 000. 00). They further maintain that their decision to establish a school in the Oyarifa area was based on the peculiar features of the land.
When the Defendants failed to fulfil their side of
AI Generated Summary
Barbara Tetteh-Charway J. of the Ghana High Court adjudicated a civil dispute over the sale of twenty plots of land at Oyarifa, Accra, intended for a new school. In 2009, Plaintiffs and Defendants orally agreed on a GH¢120,000 price; Plaintiffs made part-payment while Defendants said the land was under litigation and provided an unsigned lease. After succeeding in the underlying land case on 24 January 2014, Defendants still did not convey the plots. The court found a binding oral contract, determined Plaintiffs paid GH¢70,000 (rejecting an alleged extra GH¢7,000), and held Defendants breached by failing to convey. The court ordered interest on GH¢44,000 refunded through the police and on GH¢26,000 paid via Defendants’ lawyer, awarded GH¢20,000 general damages and GH¢10,000 costs, and directed Plaintiffs to accept the refunds. Defendants’ counterclaims—declaration of forfeiture, damages for unlawful arrest, and injunction—were rejected; the police complaint was justified, and the arrest not unlawful merely for being based on the complaint.