EBUSUAPANYIN KOBINA TAWIAH v. EBUSUAPANYIN KOFI OTWE
April 2, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- PWAMANG JSC (PRESIDING)
- PROF. MENSA – BONSU (MRS.) JSC
- KULENDI JSC
- GAEWU JSC
- DARKO ASARE JSC
April 2, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
The suit on which this appeal is predicated was commenced by the Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant (hereinafter referred to as the Appellant) on the 17th of December, 1996 through the issuance of a Writ of Summons at the High Court, Cape Coast against the Defendant/Respondent/Respondent (hereinafter referred to as the Respondent), seeking the reliefs endorsed thereon.
In the said writ, the Appellant asserted that the suit was commenced in his representative capacity as the head of the Kona Family of the Dubua Ando clan of Breman Essiam. This clan, he averred, comprised several other families including an Nsona Family, which he alleged, was headed by the Respondent.
Consistent with the foregoing, the Appellant averred that these two families had, at all material times, been members of the same wider Dubua Ando clan of Breman Essiam, enjoying equal rights, liabilities and obligations. Significantly, the Appellant contended that when it became necessary for the wider clan to take stock of clan heirlooms and stool properties, both the Kona and Nsona families came together in the presence of the police and executed documents evidencing the stock taken.
The Appellant further asserted that the Respondent’s family has however, as a result of greed, denied the participation of the Appellant’s family in the sharing of the Dubua Ando clan properties and in the general administration of the affairs of the clan. Additionally, the Appellant alleged that the Respondent mounted oppressive attacks against the Appellant’s family and at the time of the commencement of the suit, he was personally being harassed to vacate the house he lived in because the said house belonged to the ancestors of the Respondent’s family.
Appellant prayed the court for the following reliefs:
A declaration that the Nsona and Kona families of the Dubua Andoh Clan of Breman Essiam, Benin, Bedum, etc are all members of the same clan.
Declaration that both families of the said Dubua Andoh Clan enjoy equal rights over immovable, movable and other legal, equitable and customary rights that the Dubua Andoh clan gives to all its members
*An order for the
AI Generated Summary
This Supreme Court judgment, authored by Kulendi JSC and joined unanimously by Pwamang JSC (Presiding), Prof. Mensa-Bonsu JSC, Gaewu JSC, and Darko Asare JSC, concerns long-running litigation between two family heads at Breman Essiam. The Appellant, head of the Kona Family, sued in 1996 asserting that Kona and Nsona Families are co-members of a wider Dubua Ando clan with equal rights over clan properties; he sought declarations, accounting, recovery, damages, injunction, and mesne profits. The Respondent, head of the Royal Benkum Nsona Family, denied any wider clan structure, traced title (including Denkyedua and Mbofra-Mfa-Adwen) to a 1957 conveyance to his grandfather, and counterclaimed for declarations and recovery of lands and stool properties. After a failed settlement set aside for fraud, the High Court struck out the Appellant’s claim for want of prosecution in 2021 and entered judgment on the Respondent’s counterclaim. The Court of Appeal dismissed the Appellant’s appeal, noting he slept on his rights. On a further appeal limited to the strike-out, the Supreme Court held the trial court acted under inherent jurisdiction, not Order 37 procedures, and dismissed the appeal with costs.