DERICK ADU GYAMFI v. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL & ANOR
November 25, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- PWAMANG JSC (PRESIDING)
- DARKO ASARE JSC
- ADJEI-FRIMPONG JSC
- DZAMEFE JSC
- MENSAH JSC
- BARTELS-KODWO JSC
- ACKAAH-BOAFO JSC
November 25, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
There is a memorandum of issues filed by the parties and the first issue is whether the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court has been properly invoked.
The Court intends to first decide this issue. The Plaintiff mounted this action on the basis that some persons petitioned the Speaker of Parliament to set up a bi-partisan committee to investigate some alleged lapses committed by the Economic and Organized Crime Office and the Attorney – General. The court posed the question to the Plaintiff’s lawyer whether the Speaker acted on the petition and he said no.
From this answer, the court is of the opinion that there is no life issue for the court to determine since no one has violated any provision of the constitution. In the circumstances, the jurisdiction of the court is not properly invoked, and the entire case of the plaintiff is dismissed.
(SGD.) G. PWAMANG
(JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT)
(SGD.) Y. DARKO ASARE
(JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT)
(SGD.) R. ADJEI-FRIMPONG
(JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT)
(SGD.) S. DZAMEFE
(JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT)
(SGD.) P. B. MENSAH
(JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT)
(SGD.) J. BARTELS – KODWO
(JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT)
AI Generated Summary
The Supreme Court, presided over by Justice Pwamang, addressed the threshold question of whether its jurisdiction had been properly invoked in a suit initiated by the plaintiff. The plaintiff grounded the case on a petition submitted by certain individuals to the Speaker of Parliament, requesting the creation of a bi-partisan committee to investigate alleged lapses by the Economic and Organized Crime Office and the Attorney-General. Upon inquiry by the Court, the plaintiff’s lawyer conceded that the Speaker had not acted on the petition. Finding no constitutional violation and no live controversy, the Court concluded its original jurisdiction was not properly invoked and dismissed the plaintiff’s case. The judgment was endorsed by Justices Darko Asare, Adjei-Frimpong, Dzamefe, Mensah, and Bartels-Kodwo.