DADZIE AND BOATENG v. KOKOFU
February 13, 1961
SUPREME COURT
CORAM
- KORSAH
- C.J.
- VAN LARE
- SARKODEE-ADDO
- J.J.S.C
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
February 13, 1961
SUPREME COURT
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF KORSAH C.J.
Korsah, C.J., delivered the judgment of the court. This is an appeal from the judgment of Smith, J. sitting in the Land Court in exercise of its appellate jurisdiction from a judgment in a suit instituted in the Bibiani Native Court "B". The writ reads:
"The plaintiff claims from the defendant judicial relief for the defendant to show cause why the defendant has refused to give to the 1st plaintiff, the successor of late Kwame Adufo, a cocoa farm belonging to the late Kwame Adufo, which cocoa farm situate at Mpokuampa, Bibiani, given to defendant on pledge for the sum of £G7 since sixteen years ago."
The plaintiffs' case briefly stated is that, about three days before his death Kwame Adufo, who was at the time seriously ill and allegedly suffering from tuberculosis, upon the advice of the defendant (to the effect that he, Kwame Adufo, should return to his native home for medical treatment) was induced to raise a loan of £G7 from the defendant, to enable him to travel from Bibiani in Ashanti to his native home in Southern Ghana. He, however, died without being able to leave Bibiani. As security for the said loan Kwame Adufo pledged his cocoa farm to the defendant. Essie Otuwah, the niece of the said Kwame Adufo deceased, was present and witnessed a paper which was made of the transaction by making her mark and thumb-print thereto; she had testified that it was a loan transaction and not a sale of the property as alleged by the defendant.
The defendant's case is that the late Kwame Adufo offered to sell the said cocoa farm to him and one Kwasi Buampong, because they were owners of the land on which the farm was situated; after Adufo had satisfied them that the farm was not family property, they agreed to purchase it, and caused a document, exhibit B, to be prepared, which Kwame Adufo executed upon payment of £G7 to him. They had been in possession of the farm; but Kwasi Buampong, the co-purchaser, later sold his interest in the cocoa farm to the defendant for the sum of £G100. The defendant further said in cross-examination that he was not present when [p.92] the document was executed but that it was shown to him by Kwasi Buampong. He does not know the person who prepared exhibit B.
It is not disputed that there are three traditional chiefs at Bibiani (representatives of Sefwi Anhwiaso, Sankori and Nkawie) who are the three persons in charge of all the land in the area as representatives of the three chiefs who are co-owners of
AI Generated Summary
Korsah C.J. delivered the court’s judgment on an appeal arising from a dispute over a cocoa farm at Mpokuampa, Bibiani. The first plaintiff, as successor to the late Kwame Adufo, sought return of the farm allegedly pledged for a £G7 loan taken to fund medical travel shortly before Adufo died. Essie Otuwah, Adufo’s niece and an eyewitness, testified the transaction was a loan and pledge. The defendant claimed an outright sale, relying on exhibit B and asserting co-purchaser Kwasi Buampong’s involvement, but admitted he did not know or call the document’s writer and was absent at execution; Buampong was also not called. The Native Court found a pledge; Smith J. in the Land Court reversed, faulting the successor’s failure to testify. The appellate court held that was erroneous, emphasized the illiterate-agreement rule (Graves v. Ampimah), rejected objections based on passage of sixteen years and improvements under customary pledge, and restored the Native Court’s judgment allowing return of the farm.