BRUTUW v. AFERIBA AND ANOTHER
June 19, 1980
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- OSEI-HWERE J
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
June 19, 1980
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF OSEI-HWERE J.
By the indorsement on her writ the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is for:
"(a) declaration setting aside the judgment of this honourable court dated 26 August 1975 and confirmed by the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 16 June 1977 on the ground of fraud."
In her twelve-paragraphed amended statement of claim the plaintiff made the following averments:
"(1) The plaintiff is the head of family of Nana Effina Anona family of Yaayaakuano near Cape Coast in the Central Region.
(2) The land, the subject-matter of suit No. 15/70 entitled Kobena Amoasi, Odikro of Yaayaakuano for himself and on behalf of Nana Effina Anona family of Yaayaakuano versus (1) Ebusuapanyin Effua Aferiba, etc., etc. (2) Fawuhutwer of Yaayaakuano in which judgment was given by the High Court, Cape Coast, on 26 August 1975, and same was confirmed by the judgment of the Court of Appeal dated 16 June 1977, is the ancestral property of the plaintiff's family.
(3) The defendants for the purpose of obtaining the judgments referred to in paragraph (2) above and which are sought to be set aside in this action perpetrated gross and serious fraud on the High Court of Justice.
[p.468]
PARTICULARS OF FRAUD
(a) Manufacturing concrete pillars and placing them on the land in dispute so as to represent that the said pillars were placed on the land by the late John Mensah Sarbah Barrister-at-law, who died in 1910 or otherwise by Mrs. Sarah Sarbah, the mother of John Mensah Sarbah, Barrister-at-law, who died in 1917.
(b) Falsely claiming that the said John Mensah Sarbah was succeeded by his mother Mrs. Sarah Sarbah when to the knowledge of the defendants John Mensah Sarbah died leaving a will which was admitted to probate.
(c) Falsely claiming that the land in dispute belonged to John Mensah Sarbah when to the knowledge of the defendants the land did not form part of the estate of John Mensah Sarbah, because by the wills of John Mensah Sarbah, Eva Nancy Sarbah, Mrs Gwira and a trust deed, the estate of John Mensah and his mother Sarah Sarbah eventually passed into the hands of Sarah Wilhemina Adjoa Williams, nee Taylor and after her death to her lawfully wedded husband under the Ordinance—Mr. Kobena Aaba Taylor who sold all the properties in the said estate without any opposition from the defendants or from any other members of their family. And that if the land in dispute formed part of the said estate it would also have been sold.
(d) Falsely stating t
AI Generated Summary
In this original action, Ekua Brutuw, head of the Nana Effina Anona family of Yaayaakuano near Cape Coast, sought to set aside prior judgments (High Court, 26 August 1975; Court of Appeal, 16 June 1977) that had awarded control of Yaayaakuano lands to the defendants, including Ebusuapanyin Effua Aferiba and Fawuhutwer. Brutuw alleged that fraud was perpetrated by relying on recently manufactured concrete pillars marked "J.M.S." and "S.S." as purportedly historic boundary markers associated with John Mensah Sarbah or his mother. Scientific analysis of concrete samples (Exhibit H) indicated the "new J.M.S." and "S.S." pillars dated from around 1940 or later, and witnesses testified nine pillars were carried and erected about fifteen years earlier by a caretaker named Penyinyena. The court admitted Exhibit H, applied civil fraud standards, and held that the defendants (as principals) were liable for their agent’s fraudulent conduct, setting aside the earlier judgments and awarding costs to Brutuw.