AYISHETU ABDUL KADIRI v. ABDUL DWAMENAH
March 12, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- LOVELACE-JOHNSON (MS) JSC (PRESIDING)
- AMADU, JSC
- ASIEDU, JSC
- KWOFIE, JSC
- DARKO ASARE, JSC
March 12, 2025
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
(1) My lords, the only key issue for determination in the instant appeal is not novel to our jurisprudence. Apart from the constitutional and statutory provisions relevant to the distribution of marital property upon dissolution of marriage, our case law jurisprudence is replete with a rich line of decided cases on the subject to guide us in the determination of this appeal. In doing so, this court is required to apply the relevant law after our own evaluation of the peculiar facts and evidence on record before we arrive at any determination of which of the two lower courts had properly apprehended the facts and evaluated the evidence within the context of the statutory evidential burdens carried by the parties before arriving at their respective findings and conclusion.
(2) The right of a person to solely acquire and own property and for protection against any interference with a person’s property is a constitutionally guaranteed right. Article 18 of the 1992 Constitution provides as follows:
1. Every person has the right to own property either alone or in association with others.
2. No person shall be subjected to interference with the privacy of his home, property, correspondence or communication except in accordance with law and as may be necessary in a free and democratic society for public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the protection of health or morals, for the prevention of disorder or crime or for the protection of the rights or freedoms of others.
(3) This constitutional guarantee of ownership of property during marriage has received further constitutional support under Article 22 of the 1992 Constitution as follows:
1. A spouse shall not be deprived of a reasonable provision out of the estate of a spouse whether or not the spouse died having made a will.
2. Parliament shall, as practical be after the coming into force of this Constitution, enact legislation regulating the property rights of spouses.
3. With a view to achieving the full realization of the rights referred to in clause (2) of this article -
(a) spouses shall have equal access to property jointly acquired during marriage;
(b) ***assets which are jointly acquired during marriage shall be distributed equitably between the spouses upon dissolution of the mar
AI Generated Summary
This Ghana Supreme Court appeal concerns equitable distribution of marital property after dissolution of a customary, potentially polygamous marriage. The parties dispute three assets acquired during the marriage: the Ashalley Botwe property held by the Petitioner, the matrimonial home at Adenta, and an adjoining plot with structures. The trial court dissolved the marriage and attempted an equal-share swap by conveying the second house to the Petitioner while leaving the matrimonial home with the Respondent. On appeal, the Court of Appeal set aside that distribution and, under Section 20(1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, ordered the Respondent to pay GH¢50,000 to the Petitioner, settling Ashalley Botwe on her and the matrimonial/adjoining properties on him. Writing for a unanimous panel, Amadu JSC reaffirmed that marital property covers assets acquired during marriage, that equitable distribution applies only to joint acquisitions, that polygamy is not determinative of shares, and that on the evidence Respondent predominantly funded the matrimonial property. The Supreme Court dismissed the Petitioner’s appeal and affirmed the Court of Appeal’s result.