ANKRAH AND ANOTHER v. HANSEN AND ANOTHER
December 18, 1980
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- JIAGGE
- EDUSEI
- EDWARD WIREDU JJ.A
Areas of Law
- Family Law
December 18, 1980
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT OF EDWARD WIREDU J.A.
There are two appeals involved in this case. The first and the more important of the two involves a consideration of the extent to which the courts can legitimately intervene [p.850] to entertain an action for accounts brought against a head of family by members of his family in respect of family funds in his hands whilst he holds office. The second is an appeal brought against a ruling of the High Court which refused an application for joinder brought on behalf of some principal members of the plaintiff's family to join the above suit as co-defendants.
The facts of this case which have provoked the present appeal may be briefly stated as follows: The plaintiffs-respondents, hereafter referred to as the first and second plaintiffs respectively, in the manner in which they are described on the writ of summons, and the defendants-appellants, who will hereafter also be referred to as the first and second defendants, are all members of the Mantse Ankrah Family of Otublohum. This family comprises three branches, namely, the Ankrah, Okanta and the Ayi. The first defendant, on the facts before the court, is the overall head of the family. The first and second plaintiffs are the branch heads of the Ankrah and the Ayi branches respectively, whilst the second defendant is the branch head of the Okanta branch of the family.
The plaintiffs in their capacities as branch heads of the Ankrah and the Ayi branches of the family on or about 20 December 1977 issued out of the High Court, Accra, a writ against the defendants with the following endorsement:
"STATEMENT OF CLAIM
The plaintiffs jointly and severally claim against the defendants jointly and severally:
1. An account of the following sums received by the first defendant for and on behalf of the Mantse Ankrah Family of Dadebanna Otublohum, Accra that is to say:
(a) ¢160,547, the proceeds of a cheque from the Ministry of Finance, Accra on 13 September 1977.
(b) ¢13,968.95, being part of an amount, from the High Court, Accra on 30 March 1977.
(c) ¢4,000 received by the defendants from the Ghana Commercial Bank, High Street Branch, Accra in or about August 1977.
2. An account of all sums received by the defendants for and on behalf of the said family in respect of its land at Awudome or North Kaneshie, Accra, since 22 December 1976.
3. An order upon the defendants to pay to the credit of the said family's current account with the said branch bank whatever sums are found due
AI Generated Summary
This consolidated Ghana Court of Appeal case arose from the Mantse Ankrah Family of Otublohum, comprising Ankrah, Ayi, and Okanta branches. Mark Kodjoe Ankrah (Ayi) and another branch head sued the overall head, seeking accounts of family monies, including funds withdrawn from a family bank account and a compensation cheque of ¢160,547.40 for compulsory acquisition of Awudome land, and injunctions to preserve assets. The High Court granted injunctions and refused joinder of principal elders who challenged the plaintiffs’ authority. On appeal, Edward Wiredu J.A. held that, under customary law, a sitting head generally cannot be sued for accounts; principal elders may first demand accounting at a family meeting, and deposition precedes court accountability unless exceptional facts are pleaded. Finding no pleaded exceptions, the Court set aside the High Court ruling and dismissed the action. Jiagge J.A. concurred, emphasizing the dignity and discretion of heads of family; Edusei J.A. concurred without elaboration. The Court noted joinder raised a triable issue but it became academic.