ANDREWS KPOGLI VS KOANS BUILDING SOLUTION LTD
March 12, 2020
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP, JUSTICE NICHOLAS M. C. ABODAKPI (J)
Areas of Law
- Alternative dispute resolution
- Civil Procedure
March 12, 2020
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
There is before this Court a report from ADR Secretariat on successful mediation and resolution of this dispute.
The document has been duly executed by the parties.
I therefore, enter judgment in favour of parties, in accordance with the terms they have accepted as contained in the Terms of Settlement document filed on 26-02-2020:
1. That the Plaintiff Andres Kpogli has agreed to withdraw his claims because he has taken possession of the property in dispute.
That the Plaintiff has further agreed to bear his legal cost and also forgo half of the total cost of Four Thousand, Two Hundred Ghana Cedis(GH¢4, 200. 00) as part of the settlement at the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). That parties have therefore compromised that the Defendant Koans Building Solutions limited pays an amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Ghana Cedis (GH¢2, 200. 00) in full and as final settlement of the matter between them.
Both parties have agreed that these terms of settlement be adopted as consent judgment of the Honorable Court.
2. There is no order as to cost. 3. The suit is struck-out as settled.
SGD)H/L NICHOLAS M. C. ABODAKPIJUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT.
AI Generated Summary
The Ghana High Court, per His Lordship Justice Nicholas M. C. Abodakpi, entered a consent judgment following successful mediation reported by the ADR Secretariat in a property dispute between Andres Kpogli and Koans Building Solutions Limited. The parties filed and duly executed a Terms of Settlement on 26-02-2020. Under the settlement, Kpogli withdrew his claims because he had taken possession of the property at the heart of the dispute, agreed to bear his own legal cost, and to forgo half of a total cost of GH¢4,200. The parties further compromised that Koans Building Solutions Limited would pay GH¢2,200 in full and final settlement. At the parties’ request, the Court adopted the settlement as a consent judgment, made no order as to costs, and struck out the suit as settled, thereby concluding the litigation in accordance with the agreed terms.