ALHAJI IBRAHIM NAABA KULGA I & ANOR vs MOHAMMED AMINU UMAR OUEDRAOGO II
June 4, 2025
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE EDWARD TWUM J
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Constitutional Law
June 4, 2025
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
i.) A declaration that the 1st Plaintiff is the duly selected, appointed, installed and substantive Chief of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditional Area, and duly recognized as such by the Omanhene of the Awutu Traditional Area.
ii.) A declaration that the installation of the Defendant as the Chief of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditional Area whilst there is a substantive Chief will be or/and is a breach of custom, null and void and of no effect.
iii.) An order of perpetual injunction barring the installation of the Defendant as the Chief of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditionial Area until he is duly selected and appointed as such.
iv.) An order for perpetual injunction against the Defendant, restraining him from holding himself out as the Chief of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditional Area until he is duly selected and appointed as such.
v.) Costs, including solicitor’s fees and other costs occasioned by this instant suit.
vi.) Any other reliefs that the Honourable Court may deem just and fit.
Filed together with the writ of summons and statement of claim was a motion ex parte praying this court for an order of interim injunction barring the installation of the Defendant as the Chief of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditional Area with a return date of 17 April, 2025. At the hearing of the ex parte application on the return date, this court granted a limited interim injunction of ten (10) days against the installation of the Defendant as the Chief of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditional Area, with a direction to the Plaintiffs to come on notice to the Defendant upon the expiration of the ten (10) days.
The Defendant entered conditional appearance through his lawyers and has brought the instant application praying this court to set aside the writ of summons and statement of claim on the
AI Generated Summary
This High Court ruling by Justice Edward Twum addresses a jurisdictional challenge by the Defendant seeking to set aside the Plaintiffs’ writ and statement of claim on the basis that the dispute over headship of the Moshie Community in the Awutu Traditional Area is a chieftaincy matter. Plaintiffs seek declarations recognizing the 1st Plaintiff as the duly selected, installed, and recognized community head, and injunctions restraining the Defendant’s installation and representation as chief; they had earlier obtained a limited ten‑day interim injunction. Applying Article 277 of the 1992 Constitution and the Chieftaincy Act, and emphasizing the National Register of Chiefs and installation notice requirements, the court found that the Moshie headship is a migrant‑community leadership not tied to a recognized stool or lineage, and not recorded in the national register. Relying on the Supreme Court’s reviewed precedent in Republic v. High Court, Kumasi; ex parte Abubakari (No. 3), the court held the matter is not a “cause or matter affecting chieftaincy,” dismissed the application, allowed the suit to proceed, granted leave to file defense out of time, and awarded costs to Plaintiffs.