AKOSUA POKUAA v. AKOSUA POKUAA & 3ORS

By her endorsement on her writ of summons and statement of claim dated 20th February, 2024, the Plaintiff is claiming the following reliefs against the Defendants.

a. An order for declaration of title and ownership to all that piece and parcel of land lying at Beposo-Lakeside, Ashanti bounded on the North by the Pemenase road, on the south by the land of Opanin Atta Fosu, on the east by the Beposo Post office and on the west by the property of Opanin Kwabena Dwomoh in favour of Akosua Birago's family of Beposo which currently the Defendants have trespassed upon and making adverse claims to same.

b. An order for the recovery of possession of the disputed land, in favour of

Akosua Birago's family of Beposo.

c. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants, their assigns, privies, agents, workmen, and all manner of persons acting by them from interfering with Plaintiff's ownership, enjoyment and possessory rights of the disputed land.

d. Damages for unlawful trespass

e. Any further order(s) this honourable Court may grant.

CERTIFIED TRUE COPY

REGISTRAR

NRISDICTION

In her testimony before this court, the Plaintiff/Attorney averred among others that, the Plaintiff who claim to be the immediate family head of the family of Akosua Birago @ Akosua Foda of Beposo Ashanti and also customary successor of one Ama Serwaa (deceased), brought the instant matter for both herself and on behalf of members of Akosua Birago's family of Beposo. The Plaintiff added that, the 1st Defendant is the niece and immediate family head of the family of Opanin Atta Fosu's family of Beposo, while the 2nd and 3rd Defendants are traders.

According to the Plaintiff, several years ago, Akosua Birago @Akosua Foda and Opanin Atta Fosu who were uterine siblings during their lifetime discovered and cultivated a piece and parcel of land at its virgin state at Beposo-Lakeside. After the discovery of the parcel of land, Akosua Birago @ Akosua Foda and Opanin Atta Fosu, the grandparents of the Plaintiff and 1st Defendant respectively, divided the land into two portions amongst themselves where they each built their separate houses on their respective portions, and thereafter, lived peacefully on their respective portions of the land without interference from each other.

Several years later, there was a huge rainstorm which destroyed both houses, the Plaintiff added. The Plaintiff averred that, the government in power at that time introduced a policy where they granted estate