ABENA ADIYAA & ORS v. AKWASI OPOKU & ORS
2016
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- E. K. AYEBI, J.A. (PRESIDING)
- G. TORKORNOO (MRS), J.A.
- A. M. DOMAKYAAREH (MRS.), J.A
Areas of Law
- Evidence Law
- Probate and Succession
2016
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
The appellants appealed a High Court judgment on the grounds of their capacity to sue and the trial judge's misinterpretation of evidence regarding family property. They argued the head of the family neglected his duty, necessitating their intervention. In their favor, the appellate court reviewed the evidence, underlining omissions by the trial court and the improper evaluation of the burden of proof. The appellants were deemed to have the capacity to sue based on exceptions to general rules for family property cases. Consequently, the appellate court upheld all grounds of the appeal, overturning the initial judgment.
DOMAKYAAREH (MRS),J. A.
This is an appeal against the judgment of the High Court, Kumasi delivered on 15th January 2014. The said judgment was in respect of an attempt by some family members, (other than the Head of family) to protect what they described as family property. The appellants, who were plaintiffs in the court below, are sisters and they described themselves as Principal Members of the family of the late Jonathan Kwame Duodu of Offinso Kokote.
The appellants said they mounted the action for themselves and on behalf of their maternal family because their Head of Family, Opanin Kwame Sikayena failed to pursue legal action to preserve the family property. The appellants sued the Executors of the Will of the late Jonathan Kwame Duodu and a beneficiary under the Will in which they sought a declaration that the late Jonathan Kwame Duodu had no testamentary capacity to make the device in clauses 8 and 9 of his Last Will dated 15th October, 1999 as the properties therein are family properties and perpetual injunction restraining the defendants, their privies and servants from dealing with or claiming the said properties. The Will itself was not tendered in Court but the parties were in agreement as to the content of the clauses 8 and 9 of the said Will. At the end of the trial, the learned trial judge gave judgment against the plaintiff/appellants on grounds among others that the plaintiffs failed to produce evidence that they had the approval of the rest of the family to institute the action and that they failed to lead credible evidence to establish their case to merit judgment in their favour.
Aggrieved by the said judgment, the appellants mounted the instant appeal on three prongs as evidenced by the Notice of Appeal filed on 30th January 2014 and additional grounds of appeal filed on 26th June 2015 pursuant to leave granted on 16th June 2015.
The initial grounds of appeal are:-
(a) That the judgment is against the weight of the evidence
(b) Further grounds of appeal may be filed on receipt of the record of proceedings.
The additional grounds of appeal are:
(a) That the trial judge erred when he held that the plaintiffs/appellants had no capacity to institute the action
(b) That the trial judge failed to resolve the major issue as to whether or not the late Jonathan Kwame Duodu had the requisite capacity to devise the lands or farms in dispute.
We now consider the grounds of appeal in light of the applicable law and the Record of Appeal.