TRUE COLOUR EVENTS vs GLOBACOM LIMITED & ANOTHER
June 27, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE ADELAIDE ABUI KEDDEY
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Corporate Law
June 27, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
The Defendants/Applicants (hereinafter called Applicants) filed the instant application dated 10th January 2023 with a 30-paragraph supporting Affidavit and annexures praying the court to dismiss the suit against them as same is an abuse of the court process.
It is the case of the Applicant that by a writ of summons and statement of claim filed on 9th March 2015 (Exhibit ‘A’), the Plaintiff/Respondent (hereinafter called Respondents) commenced an action (Suit BDC/4/15) against Globacom Ghana Limited and Mr. Mike Adenuga claiming the following reliefs:
“An order of the Court compelling the Defendants to release all the equipments that the Plaintiff brought from South Africa to Ghana and contained in the schedules in its custody and are in the warehouse of the 1st Defendant.
Alternatively, a declaration by the court that the seizure and detention of the equipments brought by the plaintiff from South Africa to Ghana is unlawful.
General damages for wrongful detention of the plaintiff’s equipments brought from South Africa to Ghana pursuant to the agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.
The defendants be ordered to pay an amount GHC20,000.00 as legal fees and cost”.
Subsequently, the Plaintiff filed an amended writ of summons and statement of claim and prayed for the following reliefs:
An order of the Court compelling the Defendants to release all the equipments that the Plaintiff brought from South Africa to Ghana and contained in the schedules in its custody and are in the warehouse of the 1st Defendant.
Alternatively, a declaration by the court that the seizure and detention of the equipments brought by the plaintiff from South Africa to Ghana is unlawful.
An order of the Court directing the defendants to pay an amount of USD4,400.00 a day from November 2011 to the date of final judgment to the plaintiff.
USD200,000.00 being expenses that have been incurred by the plaintiff such as hotel bills, airfares, feeding and others both in Nigeria and Ghana.
USD500,000.00 being legal fees the plaintiff has incurred in South Africa, Ghana and Nigeria from November 2011 to the present.
General damages for unlawful seizure of plaintiff equipments by the defendants.
Respondent further amended the writ on 24th November 2017 and joined the 3rd Applicant to the 2nd Applicant. Thus, in suit No. BDC/4/15, the defendants were Globacom Limited, Mr. Mike Adenuga and Glo Mobile Ghana Limited (Exhibit ‘B’).
It is the contention of the Applicants that the
AI Generated Summary
The High Court, Commercial Division, presided by Her Ladyship Justice Adelaide Abui Keddey, considered an application by Globacom Ghana Limited and Glo Mobile Ghana Limited to summarily dismiss a fresh suit brought by a South African close corporation that previously sued Globacom Ghana Limited, Mr. Mike Adenuga and Glo Mobile Ghana Limited seeking release and damages for equipment detained in Globacom’s warehouse. After the trial court initially ruled for the plaintiff, the Court of Appeal set aside the writ and judgment for want of capacity because the plaintiff failed to produce incorporation documents. The defendants argued the new suit was an abuse of process and barred by res judicata. The plaintiff opposed, attaching a certificate of registration and citing authorities cautioning against striking out actions unless plainly unsustainable. The court held the prior appellate decision did not reach the merits, res judicata was inapplicable, capacity could be repaired in a fresh action, and therefore the summary dismissal application failed. The suit was ordered to proceed.