Try asking the following...
Try asking the following...
March 10, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
COURT’S DECISION ON SECTION 173 OF ACT 30
Section 173 of the Criminal and Other Offences(Procedure)Act, 1960(Act 30) states:
If at the close of the evidence in support of the charge, it appears to the Court that a case is not
made out against the accused sufficiently to require him to make a defence, the Court shall, as to
that particular charge, acquit him.2
Accused person is facing prosecution on the following charge:
STATEMENT OF OFFENCE
STEALING, CONTRARY SECTION 124(1) OF THE CRIMINAL OFFENCES ACT,
1960(ACT 29)
PARTICULARS OF OFFENCE
FRANK OBENG @ SHATTA, AGED 24YEARS, TAXI DRIVER: For that you on the 17th
day of December 2022 at about 09:30pm at Mfuom Powerline near Dunkwa-On-Offin
in the Central Circuit and within the jurisdiction of this court, stole Apsonic zone one
motor cycle valued GH¢15,000.00 the property of one Mustapha Sulley.
Section 124(1) of Act 29 states:
Whoever steals shall be guilty of a second degree felony.
Accused pleaded NOT GUILTY to the charge.
The set of facts on which prosecution relied to charge Accused person is as follows:
“Complainant Mustapha Sulley is an excavator operator and lives at Dunkwa-OnOffin. While accused person Frank Obeng @ Shatta, is a Taxi Driver and reside at
Mfuom near Dunkwa-On-Offin. On 17/12/2022 at about 9:00am, the complainant hired
the accused person’s Taxi cab for a funeral program for a fee of GH¢150.00. The
complainant after taken[sic] the vehicle also handed his Apsonic zone one motor bike
value GH¢15,000.00 to the accused for safe keeping. On his returned[sic], complainant
asked accused to bring the said motor bike and come for the said taxi cab. The accused
sent the complainant’s motor bike to him as agreed and complainant gave the accused
a sum amount of GH¢150.00. Accused person after collecting the said amount told the
complainant that he was using his motor bike for his errands which he agreed. On3
18/12/2022 at about 3:00am, the accused person called the complainant on phone and
told him he parked the motor bike in his house that thief or thieves had stolen the said
motor bike. The complainant was not satisfied with the explanation the accused gave
and he reported the case to Police. On 21/12/2022, accused was arrested and he was
charged with the offence as stated in the charge sheet and arraigned before this
honourable court.”
To prove their case against Accused, prosecution called three witnesses and closed their case.
The said witnesses were refer
AI Generated Summary
The Circuit Court, presided over by His Honour Yaw Poku Achampong, considered whether the prosecution had made out a case of stealing against Frank Obeng @ Shatta under Act 29. The complainant, Mustapha Sulley, an excavator operator, had entrusted his Apsonic Zone One motorbike to Obeng while hiring his taxi for a funeral. After returning the bike and being paid, Obeng used the bike for errands with Sulley’s agreement and later reported that it had been stolen from his residence. The prosecution called PW1, PW2, and PW3 and closed its case. Applying Act 30, Section 173, the court found no prima facie case: there was no evidence of dishonest appropriation or mens rea, only negligence in storage. Citing the Evidence Act’s burdens and relevant authorities, the court concluded that the prosecution failed to prove theft beyond reasonable doubt and acquitted and discharged Obeng.