Try asking the following...
RULING
RULING
WELBOURNE, JA
We have read all the processes in the ma3er and listened to both learned counsel’s
submissions. We have not been satisfied that the ma3er is ripe for a Ruling on the
contempt application before the trial court.
We note that counsel for the Respondent indicated that the trial court made an order for
the parties to file Wri3en Submissions on the issue of the Contempt Application. The
Applicant denies that any such order was made and we do not find any evidence of this
from the available records before us. We do not find that this application is one seeking
to arrest the Ruling on the Contempt Application as the Respondent seeks to urge on
us. Indeed there is an appeal pending against the refusal to Cross-examine the
Respondent by the trial judge.
We are constrained to grant the application for Stay of Proceedings, in the event that the
appeal if successful, will not be rendered nugatory. Also because the application for
contempt has not yet been moved at the court below.
The application for stay of proceedings pending appeal is hereby granted
(Sgd)
Margaret Welbourne (Mrs.)
(Justice of Appeal)
(Sgd)
I agree S. R. Bernasko-Essah (Mrs.)
(Justice of Appeal)
I Also Agree Jerome Noble-Nkrumah
(Justice of Appeal)