Try asking the following...
Try asking the following...
July 27, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
J U D G M E N T
Accused person was charged with the offence of defrauding by false pretence contrary to
section 131 of the criminal offences Act, Act 29 of 1960, accused person pleaded guilty with
explanation but the court entered not guilty plea for her after her explanation to the offence
charged.
The summary of the prosecution’s facts of the offence are that on the 10/6/2021 at about 10.00
am the Customs Exercise and Preventive Service (CEPS) embarked on an operation in
Kpando Municipality. During that operation, complainant’s Nissan xtrail Vehicle was
intercepted by officers of CEPS over fake documents and the vehicle taken to Ho. On the
11/6/2021 accused called the complainant on phone who confirmed to her that his vehicle
had been seized by CEPS, told complainant she has a friend who can help him retrieve the
vehicle from ECPS. Accused then asked desperate complainant to give her GH¢7,000.00 to be sent to a friend in Accra. On same day accused went to complainant’s house at Kpando
Torkor and collected the said amount under the pretext of helping complainant retrieve the
said vehicle from CEPS. Accused then promised the complainant that it will take two weeks
to work out for his vehicle but failed to do so after two weeks. Complainant on the 5/8/2021
reported the case to the police. On the 8/8/2021 accused was arrested and she stated that the
said amount was sent to one Gley Bright in Accra. She has been charged after the
investigation with this offence.
With the not guilty plea entered for the accused, the prosecution then assumed the duty of
adducing credible evidence to proof all the element of the offence beyond reasonable doubt
in order to secure the conviction of the accused as provided for under sections 11(2) and
13(1) of the Evidence Act 1975 (NRCD 323). It was held in YEBOAH AND OTHERS VRS.
THE REPUBLIC (CONSOLIDATED) [1972]2 GLR 281 that:… “the guilt of the accused must
be proven with the degree of certainty required by law. The accused has no burden on him
to prove his innocence. It is the prosecution which must prove the guilt of the accused.
The prosecution called two witnesses in this case.
The complainant James Dodzi Kporha a business man resident of Kpando Torkor gave
evidence as PW1. He said on the 10/6/2021 at about 10:00 am CEPS intercepted and
impounded his Nissan X-trail vehicle in an operation embark upon in Kpando Municipality
on the grounds that the documents covering the vehicle were fake. On th
AI Generated Summary
In the Ghana Circuit Court, His Honour (Mr.) Francis Asong Obuajo ESQ adjudicated a charge of defrauding by false pretences under section 131 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29) against an accused who facilitated payment of GH¢7,000.00 by James Dodzi Kporha to Bright Gley after CEPS seized Kporha’s Nissan X‑trail over alleged fake documents in Kpando. The prosecution relied on PW1’s account and PW2’s investigation to show the accused obtained funds under false pretence. The defence emphasized that the accused acted as a friend, arranged a conference call, transmitted the money to Bright via mobile money, and urged police involvement when recovery stalled. Citing the Evidence Act (NRCD 323) and Ghanaian authorities including Yeboah, Asiedu and Blay, the court held the prosecution failed to prove intent to defraud, false representation, or personation beyond reasonable doubt. The accused was acquitted and discharged.