THE REPUBLIC v. KWASI SARFO; EX PARTE LUCY DANSO
May 10, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE JUSTIN KOFI DORGU
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Evidence Law
May 10, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
On the 8th April 2022, the Applicant herein filed as application for committal for
contempt of Court against the Respondent. The gravamen of the Applicant’s case is
captured in paragraphs 4 through to 10 of the Affidavit in Support which I reproduce
hereunder for their full effects;-
“4. That the High Court Coram Comfort Kwasiwor Tasiame J. settled House
No. OFC.142 located at Ofankor Accra on the Applicant. Simply put, the
High Court adjudged that House No. OFC.142 as property of the
Applicant. Annexed herewith is a copy of the judgment and marked as
Exhibit 1.
5. That indeed, the High Court proceeded to restrain the Defendant who
was the husband of the Applicant and all people claiming through the
said Defendant at page 13 of the said Judgment as follows
“It is hereby ordered that, the Defnedant, his agents, servants, workmen, privies,
assigns and anyone claiming through him are hereby restrained from entering
and dealing in any manner with House No. OFC142 located at Ofankor”
6. That after the said judgment the Applicant took control of same.
7. That thereafter the Applicant engaged workmen to renovate her said
house.
8. That whilst the renovation work was ongoing, the Respondent who
knew of the said judgment and order for perpetual injunction
restraining the Defendant in the said judgment as well anyone claiming
through the Defendant, cause policemen to disrupt the renovation work.
9. That the conduct of the Respondent is willful and calculated to undermine the
adjudicative authority of this Honourable Court
10. That the conduct of the Respondent is a deliberate move and attempt to bring
the administration of justice the sole preserve of this Honourable Court into
disrepute”.
Upon service of the application, the Respondent also filed a 17 paragraph Affidavit in
Opposition and attached to it Exhibits in support of his case. I reproduce especially
paragraphs 4 through 13 in support of the Respondent’s case;-
“4. That unless expressly admitted, I deny every material allegation of fact
contained in the Affidavit in Support as if same have been set out in
extensor and denied seriatim
5. That I am the legal and equitable owner of the subject matter land
6. That the judgment that the Applicant has referred to in paragraph 5 of his
Affidavit in Support does not in any way related to the subject matter
land of which I am the legal and equitable owner of.
7. That the subject matter land forms part of a larger parcel
AI Generated Summary
Justice Justin Kofi Dorgu of the High Court considered an application by the Applicant seeking committal for contempt against Respondent Kwasi Sarfo, arising from a prior judgment in Lucy Danso v. David Nana Danso that settled House No. OFC 142-C at Ofankor on the Applicant and restrained the defendant and persons claiming through him. The Applicant alleged police-assisted disruption of renovation and trespass; Sarfo countered that he legally owns an adjacent undeveloped parcel via a 2016 deed of gift from his late uncle, David Nana Danso, and has built on it, denying any trespass or knowledge of the injunction. The Court emphasized that civil contempt is quasi-criminal and requires proof beyond reasonable doubt. Examining the scope of the prior judgment, it held that only the house—not the surrounding land—was settled on the Applicant. Finding no evidence of interference with the house and noting the absence of service of a formal injunction on the Respondent, the Court rejected the contempt claim, acquitted and discharged Sarfo, and awarded GH¢2,000 costs to him.