THE REPUBLIC v. ISSAKA SALIFU
March 31, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER HONOUR VERONIQUE PRABA TETTEH (MRS
Areas of Law
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Evidence Law
March 31, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGEMENT:
On the 18th of December 2022, at around 7 am the accused went to the store of the
complainant and requested to buy goods on credit. The shop attendant refused. The
accused went away and returned around 8 pm in the evening weilding a cutlass. He
demanded for the goods again and when he was refused, he entered the store himself
and packed some of the store items including a bag of rice, a pack of bel cola drinks, a
box of tea bag and some other items. He threatened that he would harm anyone who
came close to him and with that fear he succeeded in carrying away the items. He was
confronted that same night by the complainant. The case was later reported and the
accused arrested for committing robbery that is stealing of the items.
The accused does not deny the majority of the facts presented. He admits that he carried
the items away but claims he intended to pay for the items and only took it because the
owner was aware. He does not deny holding the cutlass but denies forcing his way into
the store. He claims that it was one of the attendants who gave him the polythene bag
that he put the items into. He also claims that he did not carry the cutlass with him and
that he took the cutlass from the store.The elements of robbery require prosecution to establish that the accused person for the
purpose of stealing used force or caused harm to the victim or he threatened criminal
assault to the victims with the intention to prevent or overcome the resistance of that or
of any other person to the stealing of the thing. Section 150 of Act 29 provides the
elements of the offence of robbery which prosecution bears the onus of proving as
follows:
150. Definition of robbery
A person who steals a thing commits robbery
(a) if in, and for the purpose of stealing the thing, that person uses force or causes harm to any
other person, or
(b) if that person uses a threat or criminal assault or harm to any other person,
with intent to prevent or overcome the resistance of the other person to the stealing of the
thing
In order to secure a conviction against the accused. See the cases of Behome v The
Republic [1979] GLR 112 and R v Dawson (1977) 64 CAR 112
The essential ingredients are basically to steal a thing by applying force or threat of
force. Prosecution must thus establish stealing and the force or threat of force used to
steal.
The accused is charged with robbery contrary to section 149 of the criminal offences act,
1960 Act 29.
AI Generated Summary
In a criminal trial before the Circuit Court, Her Honour Veronique Praba Tetteh considered a robbery charge arising from events at complainant Huseina Shaibu’s store on 18 December 2022. Refused credit in the morning, the accused returned in the evening wielding a cutlass, entered the store, packed various items including rice, bell cola drinks, tea and other goods, and threatened harm to anyone who approached, enabling him to carry the items away. The accused admitted taking the goods but claimed he intended to repay and cited consent from Ahmed. Applying Section 150 of Act 29, the court held the prosecution had not proved the specific intent and force elements of robbery. The court convicted the accused of the lesser offence of stealing and imposed a two-year prison sentence.