REPUBLIC v. HIGH COURT, (PROBATE AND ADMINISRATION DIVISION), ACCRA
May 29, 2019
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- ADINYIRA (MRS.), JSC (PRESIDING)
- DOTSE, JSC
- YEBOAH, JSC
- BAFFOE-BONNIE, JSC
- PWAMANG, JSC
May 29, 2019
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
BAFFOE-BONNIE, JSC:-
The applicant has brought this application before us following the High Court’s ruling delivered by the High Court on a preliminary point of law raised by the said applicant. The application before us is for,
a. An Order of Certiorari to quash the ruling of the High Court, Probate & Administration Division, Accra, dated 10th May, 2018 in suit No. GJ1845/17 and,
b. An Order of prohibition against the High Court from entertaining, hearing or determining the suit No. GJ1845/17 commenced by originating motion on the 14th December, 2017;
Attached to the application was a 24-paragraph affidavit. The grounds for the application are as follows:
1. The High Court, Accra lacks jurisdiction to entertain or determine the Motion/Application filed by the 1-5th. Interested parties herein to set aside the arbitral award dated 29th March, 2012 on grounds of fraud, same having been brought out of time.
2. To the extent that the application to set aside the arbitral award was brought out of the statutory prescribed time lime as circumscribed by Act 798, the High Court acted in excess of its jurisdiction by assuming jurisdiction to entertain the application.
3. Suit No.GJ1845/17 was commenced pursuant to the wrong provision of law, that is, section 58 of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act, 2010 (Act 798) rather than section 112 of the same Act.
For ease of appreciation of this ruling let us give a background of this application.
There was a long-standing dispute in Ada between two gates, the Da Gate and the Ablaokorm Gate as to which of the said two gates is entitled to nominate and install the Mankralo of Ada in the Greater Accra Region.
Over the years attempts at resolving the dispute by various committees proved futile. Finally, on the recommendation of the Ada Traditional Council, the parties submitted to a customary arbitration in respect of the dispute, paid requisite fees, participated fully and on the 29th of March, 2012, an arbitral award was delivered and same was registered at the High Court, Tema. The award was to the effect that, the Mankralo position should be ascended to by the Da gate and the Ablaokorm gate in rotation commencing with the Da gate. The Award indicated therefore that the Da Gate which had, the applicant herein, as its Mankralo candidate was to install the next Mankralo of Ada as opposed to the Ablaokorm Gate which had the 6th interested party as its Mankralo.
The 6th interested party herein, together with s
AI Generated Summary
An application invoking the Supreme Court of Ghana’s supervisory jurisdiction arose from a long-running Ada chieftaincy succession dispute between the Da Gate and the Ablaokorm Gate. After a valid customary arbitration, an award in March 2012—registered in the High Court, Tema—directed rotational occupation of the Mankralo office beginning with the Da Gate and recognized the applicant as Mankralo (Nene Agudey Obechere III). Multiple attempts by the Ablaokorm Gate to set aside the award were quashed or dismissed, and an appeal failed. The present application sought certiorari to quash a High Court ruling that dismissed the applicant’s preliminary objection to yet another motion attacking the award, and prohibition to stop that case. The Supreme Court held that its supervisory jurisdiction is limited to patent errors of law or jurisdictional defects, found none in the High Court’s preliminary ruling, and stated that any complaint about misappreciation or misconstruction must be pursued by appeal. The application was refused.