THE REPUBLIC v. HIGH COURT (CRIMINAL DIVISION), EX PARTE: STEPHEN KWABENA OPUNI
January 24, 2023
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- DOTSE JSC (PRESIDING)
- OWUSU (MS.) JSC
- LOVELACE-JOHNSON (MS.) JSC
- TORKORNOO (MRS.) JSC
- KULENDI JSC
January 24, 2023
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
DOTSE JSC:-
On the 24th day of January 2023, this Court, by a unanimous decision, dismissed an application at the instance of the Applicant herein, wherein he sought the following reliefs:-
-Certiorari directed at the High Court, (Criminal Division 1) Accra, presided over by Honyenuga JSC, sitting as an additional High Court Judge to bring into this court for the purpose of being quashed, the ruling of the Judge on the 14th day of November 2022 in case No. CR/158/2018 intitutled Republic v Stephen Kwabena Opuni and 2 others and
-For an order of perpetual injunction to restrain the presiding Judge Honyenuga JSC from continuing with the case No. CR/158/2018 intitutled Republic v Stephen Kwabena Opuni and 2 Others at the High Court, Criminal Division.
This Court in its orders dated 24th January 2023 dismissed the application referred to supra and stated as follows:-
“We have considered all the processes filed by all the parties as well as their viva voce submissions this afternoon. We are however of the considered opinion that, this court in its decision in the case, Republic v Fast Track High Court, Accra, Ex-parte Daniel [2003-2004] SCGLR 364 interpreted the relevant and operating provisions in Articles 139 (1) (c) and 145 (4) of the Constitution 1992 and these are so clear that it admits of no controversy whatsoever. Under the circumstances we hereby unanimously dismiss the applications for Certiorari and Perpetual Injunction.”
Full reasons for our decision will be filed in the Registry of this Court on or by close of day on 10th February 2023.”
We now proceed to give our reasons for the decision rendered on the 24th of January 2023 as follows:-
As stated supra, the Applicant herein through his learned Counsel Samuel Codjoe filed the instant application seeking the twin reliefs of Certiorari to quash the ruling delivered by Honyenuga JSC dated the 14th day of November 2022 pursuant to Article 132 of the Constitution 1992 and secondly for an order of perpetual injunction to restrain the Judge from continuing with case No. CR/158/2018 intitutled Republic v Stephen Kwabena Opuni, Seidu Agongo and Agricult Ghana Limited at the High Court.
GROUNDS FOR THE APPLICATION
Certiorari
1.That the learned trial Judge committed a grievous error of law apparent on the face of the record and acted without jurisdiction when he continued to sit on Suit No. CR/158/2018 intitutled as stated supra on the 11th and 17th October, 2022, 7th, 14th and 24th November 20
AI Generated Summary
The Supreme Court of Ghana, per Dotse JSC writing for a unanimous panel of Justices Owusu, Lovelace‑Johnson, Torkornoo, and Kulendi, dismissed Stephen Kwabena Opuni’s bid for certiorari and a perpetual injunction aimed at stopping Justice Clemence Honyenuga, JSC, from continuing as an additional High Court Judge in the long‑running criminal case CR/158/2018 (Republic v Opuni, Seidu Agongo, and Agricult Ghana Limited). Opuni argued that upon Honyenuga’s turning 70, his office became vacant, only the President could grant a six‑month extension under Article 145(4), and the judge breached natural justice by hearing a motion seeking to restrain him. The Attorney‑General, led by Chief State Attorney Evelyn Keelson, opposed, contending that Articles 139(1)(c) and 145(4), as interpreted in Ex‑parte Daniel, empower the Chief Justice to designate and extend superior court judges and that “proceedings” had commenced before retirement. The Court agreed, found no genuine constitutional interpretation issue requiring referral under Article 130(2), rejected the nemo judex claim as factually unsupported, and affirmed the trial judge’s jurisdiction.