Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
FACTS:
The above Respondents were cited for contempt pursuant to a contempt application.
The Plaintiffs/Applicants herein have sued the Defendants jointly and severally for the
following reliefs:
i. A declaration by the Honourable Court that following resolution of the first
General Conference (Governing Body) of the Apostle's Revelation Society for
the year 2020 dated 26th September 2020 and held at the International
Headquarters of the Church at New Tadzewu in the Volta Region of the
Republic of Ghana, the 1st Defendant herein is no longer the leader of the
Apostles Revelation Society Church and the Chairman of the General
Conference of the Apostles Revelation Society.
ii. An order of the Court directed at the 1st Defendant to vacate the residence of
the leader of the Church located within the premises of the Church.
iii. An order of perpetual injunction directed at the 1st Defendant, his servants,
agents, privies, assigns, successors in title, personal representatives or any
person claiming through him from holding himself out as the Leader of the
Church howsoever or whatsoever or in any manner interfering with or in the
management and administration of the Church or holding himself out as the
Chairman of the General Conference of the Apostles Revelation Society.
iv. Cost of this litigation.
Pending the determination of the suit, the Applicants applied to the Court for an Order of
interlocutory injunction which the Honourable Court granted on the 9th February 2021
and injuncted the 1st Defendant in the following terms:
"it is hereby ordered that the Defendants herein and anybody claiming through
them are hereby restrained from having anything to do with the finances of the
Church.
It is further ordered that the Registrar, the Applicants together with the Financial
Director and Accountant of the Church as well as the Executive Committee of the
Church are to issue the pocket calendar for 2021. They are to assume the financial
administration of the Church pending the final determination of the case."
It is the case of the Applicants that the Order together with a Penal Notice was served on
the 1st Respondent and he knew exactly what he was restrained from doing. That the 1st
Respondent demonstrating further awareness of the pendency of the Order against him
filed a Notice of Appeal against same on the 3rd day of March 2021 and followed it up
with Applications for Stay of Execution of the Order on the 26th of February 2021