Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
JUDGEMENT
The accused person herein is charged with Publication of obscene material contrary to
section 280 of the Criminal Offences Act 1960, (Act 29) and Emotional Abuse contrary to
section 1(b)(iv) of the Domestic Violence Act 732 of 2007.
He pleaded not guilty to both charges and so the prosecution assumed the burden to
prove the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
FACTS OF THE CASE
The facts in support of the charges are that the complainant is a teacher and resides at
Safokrom while the accused is an evangelist and resides at Ketan a suburb of Sekondi.
The complainant and the accused person were in a relationship for about 7 years. The
relationship got sour for lack of trust and the complainant threatened to break up with
the accused. During the relationship, the complainant engaged the accused and he
created a Facebook account for her. As a result, the accused became familiar with her
username and password. On 25/04/2020 the complainant went to the accused and told
him she could no longer be in the relationship. The accused then demanded to have his
final sex or take monetary compensation from the complainant else he will defame her.
The complainant refused the demand of the accused and left. That same day the
accused logged into the complainant’s Facebook account and posted a secretly recorded
sexual intercourse he had with her in his room. The video went viral on social media
and persons who had access to viewing it started calling the complainant and
prompting her about the video. The accused also sent said video to the complainant via
WhatsApp. On 26/04/2020, the complainant reported the matter at the Sekondi Police
station and the accused was arrested. An investigation cautioned statement was
obtained from him and after investigations, the accused was charged with the offence
and put before this honourable court.
It is trite that in criminal prosecutions it is the prosecution that carries the burden to
prove the guilt of the accused person beyond reasonable doubt. The accused has no
such burden to prove his innocence. All he needs to do is to raise a doubt in the case of the prosecution. This is expressed in section 11(2) of the Evidence Act 1975, NRCD 323
which provides that:
“In a criminal action, the burden of producing evidence when it is on the
prosecution as to any fact which is essential to guilt requires the prosecution to
produce sufficient evidence so that on all the evidence a reasonable mind