THE REPUBLIC v. ASP JOSEPH KOJO CHIPKA & 3 OTHERS, EX PARTE: ALI DICKSON
2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- His Lordship Justice Kweku T. Ackaah-Boafo
Areas of Law
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Civil Procedure
2019
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
AI Generated Summary
The Applicant filed a motion for committal for contempt against police officers and a civilian for allegedly failing to return seized mining equipment as ordered by a District Court. The Respondents denied willful disobedience and argued compliance with standard procedures. The High Court scrutinized the case, noting the order was quashed by a higher court, and found insufficient proof of contempt beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the court acquitted and discharged the Respondents, highlighting the misuse of contempt proceedings by the Applicant.
DECISION
APPLICATION FOR COMMITTAL FOR CONTEMPT
Introduction:
[1] Contempt of Court is the mechanism which the law provides for the protection of the authority of the court from improper interference. Contempt arises in many ways but includes a breach of a court order, an attempt to obstruct the administration of justice, a deliberate attack upon the integrity of a court or a judge that interferes with proceedings, or some other form of conduct not foreseeable. Contempt of court is part of a court's inherent jurisdiction and, as it is not precisely prescribed or enacted, should be exercised with scrupulous care and only when the circumstances are clear and beyond reasonable doubt.
[2] The power of the High Court to punish for contempt is provided in Articles 19(12) and 126 of the 1992 Republican Constitution of Ghana, and re-enacted in S 36 of the Courts Act, 1993 (Act 459) as amended; S10 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29) and Order 50 of the High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004 (CI 47). Order 50 of CI 47 sets the parameters by which an Applicant may move the court for an order for an attachment for contempt of court.
[3] There is no codified legislation in Ghana that defines the act or omission that constitute the offence of contempt unlike the United Kingdom Contempt of Court Act[1]. Ghanaian courts therefore resort to case law to resolve any issue regarding contempt when confronted with one.
[4] A succinct and frequently quoted definition of contempt is found in R v SITO I; EX PARTE FORDJOUR [2], where the Supreme Court offered the following as constituting the offence of contempt:
a) there should have been a judgment or order which required the contemnor to do or abstain from doing something;
b) the contemnor knew what precisely he was expected to do or abstain from doing; and
c) that he failed to comply with the terms of that judgment or the order and that his disobedience was willful.
[5] Also, in IN RE: EFFIDUASE STOOL AFFAIRS (No.2); EX PARTE AMEYAW II (1998-1999) SCGLR 639 at 660 Justice Acquah (as he then was) offered the following definition of contempt. He opined that:
“In brief, contempt is constituted by any act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration of justice, or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority.”
[6] Generally and based on the law, it is roundly agreed upon by the authorities that contempt of court being quasi-criminal, the standa