THE REPUBLIC v. FIDELIA FLOVI & ANOTHER
April 26, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP NELSON DELASI AWUKU DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Areas of Law
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Property and Real Estate Law
April 26, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
BACKGROUND
On 11th of June,2020, the accused persons were arraigned before this Court on a charge of
trespass contrary to section 157 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29).
BRIEF FACTS
The brief facts attached by the prosecution disclosed that the complainant Kwame Flovi
is a 54-year-old farmer and a resident of Flovikorpe in Weta whilst the accused persons
Fidelia Flovi and Akakpo Tsipote are 59 years and 48 years respectively and residents of
Flovikorpe and Morkorpe in Weta.
The facts indicated that the complainant has a vast land at Flovikorpe which he secured
judgment over against one Dotse Apetsi and Torgbui Ashiakpor IV.
The prosecution stated that the complainant after the judgment sold a portion of the land
to one Mawu Xesumale who immediately caused a trip of sand to be deposited on his
purchased land.
The Prosecution that whiles in his house a day after the sale of the land, the complainant
was informed by the buyer that the accused persons had trespassed on to the land he
purchased and erected red flags on it.
The Prosecution stated that complainant upon confirmation made a report to the police
and the accused persons were arrested.
The Prosecution stated that A1 admitted the offence but stated that the land in issue was
her farmland. A2 was stated to have denied the offence and stated further that it was
Torgbui Ashiakpor the paramount Chief of Weta who instructed him to tell A1 and
family to erect the flags on the land.
Both accused persons were arraigned before the court after investigations for
prosecution.
THE CASE OF PROSECUTION
The prosecution relied on the evidence of the complainant as its firs witness and the
police investigator Theodore Effah Abayie as a second witness.
In addition to their witness statements, cautioned statements and charge statements of
the accused persons were tendered in evidence and adopted as Exhibits A, A1, B and B1.
Other documents tendered and adopted in evidence included a photograph of the scene
of crime and a copy of the judgment of the court marked Exhibits C and D.
In his evidence in chief PW1 stated that he is the owner of a vast land situated at
Flovikorpe in Weta opposite the District Hospital.
PW1 stated that on the 27th of February, he sold a portion of the land measuring 100×70
to one Mawu Xesumale.
PW1 stated that after the sale he received a call from the buyer who informed him that
some persons have gone to erect poles tied with red pieces of cloth on th
AI Generated Summary
Kwame Flovi, a farmer from Flovikorpe in Weta, secured a civil judgment recognizing his and his family’s long possession of a tract of land. Relying on that judgment, he sold a 100×70 portion to Mawu Xesumale, who deposited a trip of sand on the plot. Soon after, the buyer reported that Fidelia Flovi and Akakpo Tsipote had erected poles tied with red flags on the land, allegedly with permission from the late Torgbui Ashiakpor IV. Police arrested the two, and the prosecution tendered their statements, a photograph of the scene, and the civil judgment (Exhibit D). At trial, A1 maintained the land belonged to the Flovi family and the flags aimed to draw out the unknown depositor; A2 said he acted on instruction from the Weta paramount chief. Applying the Evidence Act burdens and trespass elements in section 157 of Act 29, the Magistrate found the land to be family property, saw a bona fide title dispute, and ruled the prosecution had not proved exclusive ownership or occupier status. The accused were acquitted and discharged.