THE REPUBLIC v. FIADUKO ADUKPO THOMPSON
March 9, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP NELSON DELASI AWUKU DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
Areas of Law
- Criminal Law and Procedure
- Evidence Law
March 9, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
BACKGROUND
The accused person was arraigned before this Court on 25th January, 2021 on a charge of
causing harm contrary to Section 69 of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 (Act 29).
BRIEF FACTS
The facts as attached by the Prosecution stated that the complainant Believer Agbitor is a
farmer and a resident of Dalikorpe while the accused person is also a farmer and a
resident of Dzodze-Kpelikorpe.
The prosecution stated that, there is a land dispute between the parties, which suit is
pending before this court.
The Prosecution stated that on the 5
th of August, 2020 at about 8:30am the complainant
went to the said land to harvest his corn when to his dismay the accused confronted him
and hit his right thigh with a stick.
The Prosecution stated that the complaint had a structure on his leg and the accused took
his cutlass and went away with it, leaving the complainant screaming for his ten (10)
years old son who heard him to trace him to the farm and saw him on the floor.
The prosecution stated that, with the assistance of others the complainant was carried
together with the piece of stick as evidence to the police station to make a report.
The prosecution stated that, the complainant was issued with a medical form to attend
hospital and that on the 6th August, 2020 he was visited at the emergency ward of the St.
Anthony Hospital where he was receiving treatment with his right leg bandaged.
The prosecution stated that on 14th December, 2020, the complainant submitted his
medical report to police duly endorsed and the finding for his condition was given as
fracture of distal 3rd of the right femur.
The prosecution stated that, the accused who later reported himself to the police, denied
the offence in his cautioned statement and stated that, the complainant rather came to
harvest his corn and when he confronted him, he became offended and wanted to attack
him with a cutlass but he blocked it with a stick he picked from the ground.
PLEA OF ACCUSED
The accused person pleaded not guilty to the offence when the charge and particulars of
the offences were read and interpreted to him and was admitted to bail.
Witness statements of witnesses of prosecution together with the charge statement and
investigation caution statement of the accused person were filed by the prosecution
together with a medical report and a photograph evidencing the injured state of the
complainant and served on the accused for trial.
THE CASE OF PROSECUTION
The
AI Generated Summary
This criminal proceeding arose from a dispute between farmers Believer Agbitor of Dalikorpe and the accused of Dzodze-Kpelikorpe. The prosecution alleged that on August 5, 2020, while Agbitor harvested corn on the disputed land, the accused confronted him, struck his right thigh with a stick, took his cutlass, and left; Agbitor’s ten-year-old son Ellen and others carried him and a stick to the police. Agbitor received treatment at St. Anthony Hospital and later produced a medical report showing a distal third right femoral fracture. The accused denied causing harm, asserting he blocked an attempted cutlass attack and reported the incident to police, also claiming Agbitor had previously been knocked by a motorbike. Applying the Evidence Act Section 11 standards, the court stressed the prosecution’s burden to prove guilt and causation beyond reasonable doubt. It found the case deficient due to failure to call material witnesses and inconsistencies, and highlighted a disconnect between the alleged stick and the severity of injury. The accused was acquitted and discharged.