Try asking the following...
RULING
The Plaintiff instituted this action against the Defendants for the reliefs endorsed on the writ of summons: (a) A declaration that all that piece of land situate lying and being at Abehenease near Amasaman and bound on the North by lessor’s land measuring 183. 4feet more or less on the East by lessor’s land measuring … feet more or less on the South being proposed road measuring 199. 9 feet more or less on the West by lessor’s land measuring 121. 8 feet more or less and containing an approximate area of 0. 47 acre or 0. 17 hectare more or less belonging to the Plaintiff(b) An order directed against all the Defendants to give vacant possession of the said land belonging to the Plaintiff(c) Perpetual injunction to restrain the Defendant from trespassing on this land(d) Cost The Applicant avers that she is not a necessary party to the suit and has resolved all matters with the Plaintiff before he instituted this action so she should be struck out as a party.
The Plaintiff denies same and avers that he has not had any discussion with the 6th Defendant.
The 6th Defendant does not also deny being in occupation of the subject matter.
This 6th Defendant is a necessary party.
The application to be struck out as a Party is hereby dismissed.
Adjourned to 20th June 2023 at 11: 00am for application for injunction to be taken.
SGD)H/L PRISCILLA DAPAAH MIREKU (MRS. )(JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT).