SEGBEDZI AMANYO SUBSTITUTED BY KOFITSE AKORLI v. MAMANYE GBETORNYEKU & 2 ORS.
May 5, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP NELSON DELASI AWUKU
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Evidence Law
May 5, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:
The plaintiff filed a Writ of Summons on the 14th March, 2016 in this Court seeking the
following reliefs;
a. Declaration of title, ownership and recovery of possession of all that parcel of land situate,
lying and being at Ehi - Horme and bounded on all four sides by the property of the plaintiff.
b. Perpetual injunction restraining the defendant by herself, her agents, assigns, workmen and
privies from entering the disputed land.
c. General damages for trespass.
CASE OF THE PLAINTIFF
In a statement of claim filed on 12th December,2016, the plaintiff stated that he is the
customary successor of his father Amenyo.
The plaintiff stated that his ancestor Torgbui Goli who hails from Weta fought alongside
the Penyi people in protecting Penyi land and after the war the Penyi people led by
Torgbui Awasiame, Torgbui Kporkporte gave a large tract of land at Ehi to him in
appreciation for his support during the war.
The plaintiff stated that Goli gave birth to Eya who gave birth to Amable and Amable
also gave birth to Eze his grandfather from whom his father Amenyo inherited.
The plaintiff stated that the land founded by his ancestor Goli is bounded as follows;
i. On the first side by Weta land occupied by Agbasaklimah and Ashiakpor
ii. On the second side by Klikor land occupied by Torgbui Addo
iii. On the third side by Torgbui Korsorku and
iv. On the fourth side by Penyi land occupied by Awasiame and Kporkporte.
The plaintiff stated that the portion of the larger land in dispute is bounded on all the
four sides by Torgbe Goli’s larger land.
The plaintiff stated that his predecessors stayed on the land in dispute and the larger land
without any hindrance until the plaintiff was sued by one Agbotsoka of Anyiwome
before this court which matter he failed to prosecute.
The plaintiff stated that he has been on the disputed land with his children for so many
years until the 1st defendant trespassed on it and when confronted stated that, she rented
the land from Kumah Semador.
THE CASE OF DEFENDANTS
In his defence filed on 4th January, 2017 the defendants denied the claim claim by the
plaintiff that his ancestor named Goli fought alongside the people of Penyi in protection
of Penyi land.
The Defendants also denied the claim that a large tract of land was given to Goli the
plaintiff’s ancestor by Torgbui Awasiame for his contributions in securing the Penyi land.
The Defendants denied the claim by the plaintiff th
AI Generated Summary
Segbedzi Amanyo initiated a land action on March 14, 2016 seeking declaration of title, recovery of possession, injunction, and damages over a parcel at Ehi-Horme. He traced ownership to his ancestor, Torgbui Goli, allegedly gifted a large tract of land by Penyi leaders Torgbui Awasiame and Torgbui Kporkporte for wartime assistance, and claimed inheritance through Eya and his father, Amenyo. Defendants Mamanye Gbetornyeku, later joined by Francis Yao Senanu and Torgbui Adza Dzikunu, denied plaintiff’s exclusive lineage and argued the land originally belonged to Torgbui Ago of Weta, that Goli had multiple children, and that the disputed portion devolved through Eworsa and Semador to their family, with a mortgage to the first defendant. The court emphasized the plaintiff’s burden to prove acts of ownership and possession. While defense testimony corroborated that Goli founded the land, the plaintiff failed to adduce material evidence of exclusive possession; his sole witness admitted no knowledge of the land. Relying on Evidence Act standards and case law on corroboration and traditional evidence, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims and awarded costs to the defendants.