Try asking the following...
CONSENT JUDGMENT
The Court on the 5th of June, 2023 was presented with the Mediation Report filed
by Mr. Patrick Agego-Aziza, the Court-connected ADR Mediator. The Court was of
the view that since the document was in the handwriting of the ADR Mediator, it
was advisable for both Counsel to type same and cause parties to append their
signatures for ease of reading.
Both Counsel have complied with this Order and have typed the said Report and
duly attached same to the ADR Mediator’s handwritten one.
I have examined both documents and though the typed one is an exact copy of the
handwritten one, I am of the view that, the Order was rather superfluous. I hereby
rescind same.
I will therefore go ahead and adopt the hand-written Report presented by the ADR
Mediator, Mr. Agego-Aziza on the 5th of June, 2023 as I do not doubt its authenticity
and none of the parties have objected to same.
Parties are in Court and their signatures have been duly appended on the report.
Respective Counsel for parties have also appended their signatures.
The Court hereby adopts the ADR Report presented on the 5th of June, 2023 by the
said ADR Mediator Mr. Agego-Aziza as Consent Judgment of this Court.
H/L: RITA AGYEMAN-BUDU (MRS)
(JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT).