SAMUEL AYIM VS THE LANDS COMMISSION
April 27, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE JENNIFER ANNE MYERS AHMED (MRS)
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Evidence Law
April 27, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
The Plaintiff by a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim filed on 7th November, 2013 instituted this instant action initially against the Defendant herein and the Attorney-General as the 2nd Defendant.
However, pursuant to an motion filed on the 2nd day of June 2016 the suit was discontinued against the Attorney-General on the 8th of June, 2016. The Plaintiff by his writ of summons and statement of claim prayed for the following reliefs from the defendant: a. Declaration that the valuation report prepared by the independent valuer represents the true and the proper values of the Plaintiff’s properties Nos.
L77 and L78; b. An order that the Plaintiff recovers the amount of GH₵ 91, 510. 00 being the difference of the actual amount paid to the Plaintiff by the Defendant in the sum of GH₵ 53, 890. 00 and the proper valuation amount of GH₵ 145, 400. 00. c. An order that the Plaintiff recovers from the Defendant the outstanding cost of the land in the sum of GH₵27, 500. 00 d. An order that all payment be made with interest at prevailing commercial bank rate from 29th June, 2011 to date of final payment.
e. Cost of the proceedings.
The facts of this case are bereft of any complexity.
The Plaintiff’s case is that, on or about 30th November, 2009 the Defendant by a letter entitled “Awoshie-Pokuase Road and Urban Development Project” informed him that his properties situate at Awoshie have been affected by the said project and would have to be demolished.
Additionally, the said letter communicated the Plaintiff’s entitlement to compensation and the modalities for computing and accessing the compensation.
The Plaintiff averred that his affected property was in two lots made up of seven stores and two (2) bedroom accommodation and identified by the Defendants as DUR/AC/APR/09/77 and DUR/AC/APR/09/78 respectively.
Property L78 is made up of three (3) commercial shops, two (2) bedrooms, a hall, kitchen, sanitary area and a porch whereas property L77 is comprised of 4 commercial shops.
The Plaintiff further avers that he was subsequently informed by two letters dated 17th March, 2011 and captioned “RE: State Lands (Statutory Wayleaves – Awoshie-Pokuase Road) Instrument, 2006. E. I. 19 Phase II.
Compensation Valuation Properties Nos.
DUR/AC/APR/09/77 and DUR/AC/APR/09/78” that compensation being recommended for the Plaintiff’s properties aforementioned are Eighteen Thousand, One Hundred and Ten Ghana Cedis (GH₵18, 110. 00) and Thirty-five Thousand, Seven Hundr
AI Generated Summary
The High Court, presided over by Her Ladyship Justice Jennifer Anne Myers Ahmed, resolved a compensation dispute arising from the Awoshie–Pokuase Road and Urban Development Project. The Department of Urban Roads informed the Plaintiff in 2009 that his Awoshie properties (L77 and L78), containing shops and a two-bedroom dwelling, would be demolished. In 2011, the Defendant recommended and paid compensation totaling GH₵53,890, which the Plaintiff accepted amid a medical emergency. After recovery, an independent valuation assessed L77 at GH₵55,000 and L78 at GH₵90,400 (total GH₵145,400). The Plaintiff sought the difference and the land cost (GH₵27,500). The Defendant failed to appear despite notice; the court deemed it to have closed its case but insisted the Plaintiff prove his claims. Relying on unchallenged documentary evidence and principles under the Evidence Act, the court entered judgment for the Plaintiff on all reliefs (save the already granted land cost), with costs of GH₵5,000 and interest at the prevailing rate.