ROSE KWAKYE v. KWAKU DAFFOUR ANYAN AND RICHARD KOFI AWUAH KWAKYE
March 16, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS LORDSHIP JUSTICE RICHARD APIETU (J
Areas of Law
- Civil Procedure
- Probate and Succession
March 16, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
This is an application for an order of the Court to amend the Plaintiff’s reliefs and
Statement of Claim.
I have read the application, the supporting affidavit and supplementary affidavit in
support of the application. I have also read the affidavit in opposition. I have also
given consideration to the written submissions filed by counsel for and against the
grant or otherwise of the application. I am of the considered view that the issues which
this court has been called upon to determine are:
1. Whether or not the Plaintiff’s application is competent?
2. Whether or not the Plaintiff’s amendment should be granted?
I intend to resolve the first issue that is “Whether or not the Plaintiff’s application is
competent”?
In doing so reference shall be made to Order 16 Rule 5 of the High Court Civil
Procedure Rules, C.I. 47 which provides that:
(1) “Subject to order 4 rules 5 & 6 and to the following provisions of this rule, the court
may at any stage of the proceedings upon an application by the plaintiff or any other
party grant leave to
(a) the plaintiff to amend the plaintiff’s writ, or
(b) any party to amend the party’s pleading on such terms as to costs or otherwise as
may be just and in such manner as it may direct”.
Reference shall also be made to Order 16 Rule 11 of C.I. 47 which provides as follows:
(1) An application for leave to amend a writ or a pleading shall be made on notice to
all the other parties to the action.
(2) The application shall specify precisely the nature of the amendment intended to be
made.
There is no doubt that the present application has been brought by the Plaintiff
without indicating what she is seeking leave of the court to amend. The question to be
answered then is does the failure of the Plaintiff to indicate what she is seeking leave
to amend, make her application incompetent?
It is my view that the failure of the Plaintiff to indicate that she is seeking leave to
amend her Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim does not make her application
incompetent because in any case, the Plaintiff cannot amend her Writ of Summons
and Statement of Case without first bringing an application before the court hence the
reason for bringing this application. In my opinion once the Plaintiff is before the court
seeking to amend her Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim, the application is
competent whether or not the word leave is indicated in the application.
Having found the Plaintiff’s application c
AI Generated Summary
Justice Richard Apietu of the High Court decided an interlocutory motion by a plaintiff to amend her reliefs and Statement of Claim in a suit seeking recognition of her status as the widow of the deceased, Alexander Adofo Kwakye. Applying Order 16 Rules 5 and 11 of the High Court Civil Procedure Rules, C.I. 47, and the Yeboa v Bofour amendment test, as endorsed in In Re Ashalley Botwe Lands, the court held the application competent despite not expressly seeking “leave.” The court granted unopposed new reliefs (i) and (ii) and ordered amendment within 14 days, but refused reliefs (iii) and (iv) (hospital/medical records and an account) and relief (vii) (exhumation) as irrelevant, surprising, vague, or in bad faith. Proposed paragraphs 17–18 and 20, 21, 23, 24 were disallowed because they would introduce new parties—Continental Trading Company Limited and Paramount Printing Press Limited—and because company assets belong to companies, not shareholders. The suit was characterized as a status declaration, not an estate action. No order as to costs was made.