REV. BOAKYE BOATENG & ANOR VS AUNTIE AGGIE & ORS
April 19, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE ANANDA J. AIKINS (MRS).
Areas of Law
- Administrative Law
- Civil Procedure
April 19, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
RULING ON APPLICATION FOR MANDAMUS
The court is of the opinion, after a careful consideration of the present application, the respondent’s affidavit in opposition and the submissions made by both counsel, that the application lacks merit and so same is refused.
The applicants are rather ordered to submit themselves to the respondent/Assembly for advice on the issue of the squatters in front of their premises since the applicants in paragraph 7 of their own affidavit admit that they are not the owners of the land on which the squatters have placed their structures.
Cost of GH¢1, 000 against applicants in favour of the respondents.
The substantive matter is to take its normal course.
(SGD. )JUSTICE ANANDA J. AIKINS (MRS) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT*caa*.
AI Generated Summary
In the High Court, Her Ladyship Justice Ananda J. Aikins (Mrs) ruled on an application for mandamus brought by applicants seeking relief concerning squatters positioned in front of their premises. After reviewing the present application, the respondent Assembly’s affidavit in opposition, and submissions from both counsel, the court found the application lacked merit and refused the extraordinary remedy. Central to the court’s assessment was the applicants’ own affidavit admission that they are not the owners of the land on which the squatters have placed structures, which significantly undermined their claim to mandamus relief tied to that land. The court directed the applicants to submit themselves to the respondent Assembly for advice on how to address the squatters issue. Costs of GH c2 a21,000 were awarded against the applicants, and the substantive matter was left to proceed in its normal course.