REGINA OSEI v. MASTER AWORTWE
January 20, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS WORSHIP MAXWELL OFORI
- KPODO, ESQ
Areas of Law
- Contract Law
- Commercial Law
January 20, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
By a writ issued on 16th March, 2021 seeking the following reliefs thereof.
Plaintiff claims against the Defendant as follows:
(a) Plaintiff claims from the Defendant is for recovery of cash the sum of Three
Thousand, One Hundred and Fifty Ghana Cedis (GH¢3,150.00) being amount
Defendant collected from Plaintiff under the pretext of supplying Plaintiff with
Stihl Mower Machine but failed to supply the exact as agreed upon brand and
rather supplied Honda 4 Mower Machine which developed fault soon after
Defendant supplied it to Plaintiff.
(b) Refund of One Hundred and Forty Ghana Cedis (GH¢140.00) which amount
Defendant collected from Plaintiff to purchase spare parts to repair the machine
but has failed to repair it or refund the said money since February, 2020.
PLAINTIFF’S CASE
Plaintiff is a seamstress and lives at Twifo Mampong. That somewhere in April 2019, she
had a conversation with one E.K in regards to Stihl machine (mower) for use. The said
E.K. introduced the Plaintiff to one Mr. Awortwe (Defendant) for which they went to see
him along with her husband and father. The Plaintiff averred that the Defendant could
not get her the Stihl mower machine at that moment but agreed to import some from
China. The purchase price of the mower agreed on was GH¢3,300 which Plaintiff secured
a loan from the bank and initially made part payment of GH¢2,700.00 for the purchase
price leaving a balance of GH¢600 to be paid.
Defendant promised to bring the mower through importation as soon as possible but it
took 4 months before the mower machine was brought which was different from what
was agreed upon. Defendant brought Honda 4 Mower Machine instead of Stihl Mower
Machine. According to the Plaintiff the Defendant explained that the machine he
(Defendant) whatsapp to the company wasn’t the exact machine brought and pleaded
with Plaintiff to use the Honda 4 Mower Machine since both machines possessed the
same qualities. Plaintiff worked with the Stihl mower machine for 3 months and it started
developing some mechanical fault.
Defendant requested for the balance to enable him use some to buy the spare part which
was not available in Ghana.
Upon several demands by the Defendant for the balance, the matter was reported to
TOPP Police where Defendant was invited. At the Police Station, Plaintiff paid the
balance GH¢400.00 for the Defendant to take the GH¢200.00 and use the remaining
GH¢200.00 to buy the spare parts. Defendant later brought
AI Generated Summary
His Worship Maxwell Ofori Kpodo, Esq., presiding as Magistrate, resolved a sales dispute between a Twifo Mampong seamstress and Mr. Awortwe, a TOPP Clinic laboratory technician from Twifo Ntafrewaso. Through E.K., the seamstress sought a Stihl mower, agreed to pay GH¢3,300, and funded the purchase by bank loan, paying GH¢2,700 initially. After four months, Awortwe delivered a Honda 4 mower instead of the agreed Stihl, assuring similar qualities. The machine repeatedly failed; spare parts were sought via TOPP Police, with GH¢200 and later GH¢140 paid. The buyer later learned in Kumasi a Honda 4 mower cost about GH¢800, felt deceived, and requested refund or replacement. Applying section 13 of the Sale of Goods Act and the Evidence Act’s burden-shifting principles, the court found latent defects and breach of a condition, ordering a new mower or GH¢3,298 refund, plus GH¢1,000 costs.