OSEI OWUSU ANSAH v. HFC BANK (GHANA) LTD AND O’SULLIVAN ESTATE LTD ACCRA
March 23, 2023
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- JUSTICE HENRY KWOFIE (MR.) J.A (PRESIDING)
- JUSTICE ANTHONY OPPONG (MR.) J.A.
- JUSTICE SOPHIA ROSETTA BERNASKO ESSAH (MRS.) J.A
March 23, 2023
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
J U D G M E N T
SOPHIA R. BERNASKO ESSAH (MRS) JA:
This is an appeal by the Plaintiff/Appellant against a judgment of the High Court dated
19th February, 2020 in which the trial Court dismissed the claims of the Plaintiff and entered judgment for the Defendant/Respondent. The grounds of appeal filed on 24th
February, 2020 were as follows:
i. That the judgment is against the weight of evidence.
ii. The cost awarded by the learned judge against the Plaintiff is excessive.
iii. Additional grounds of appeal to be filed upon receipt of the copy of the judgment.
On the 23rd of July 2020, reference page 132 of ROA, the following additional grounds of
appeal were filed:
i. That the learned trial judge erred when he found that the Plaintiff/Appellant was given
vacant and peaceful possession of the land.
ii. That the learned trial judge erred when he found that the Plaintiff/Appellant failed to
protect his interest in the land.
iii. The learned trial judge erred when he found that the 1st Defendant/Appellant is not
liable to the Plaintiff /Respondent.
In this delivery, the Plaintiff/Appellant will be referred to as Plaintiff, and the Defendant/
Respondent, Defendant.
The facts of this case do not lend themselves to much controversy.
Plaintiff, is a chartered Auditor by profession and resident in Kumasi. The 1st Defendant
is a bank, while the 2nd Defendant is a company engaged in real estate. By a Deed of
Assignment dated 4th December, 2002, 2nd Defendant assigned all of its unexpired
interest in a piece of land described as Plot No. 15, Baatsona, and measuring about 0.2
acres to Plaintiff. Prior to the signing of the Deed of Assignment with 2nd Defendant,
Plaintiff dealt with the 1st Defendant and its subsidiaries with regards to discussions for
the Sale and payment of the land. Having paid the total purchase price of $10,880, and upon execution of the Deed of Assignment with 2nd Defendant, he was granted a Land
Title Certificate. He then commenced building of a 4 bedroom structure on the land and
by June, 2009, the building had been constructed up to lintel level. He thereafter travelled
out of the Jurisdiction. Upon his return on or about April, 2010, he discovered that his
building had been pulled down and a wall built around the land. He reported the maeer
to the police. He also notified the 1st Defendant who informed him of the pendency of a
Court case between the 2nd Defendant and another family over the land and advised him
to
AI Generated Summary
Justice Sophia Rosetta Bernasko Essah authored a Court of Appeal decision dismissing an appeal by a chartered auditor who had bought Plot No. 15, Baatsona from a real estate company and paid $10,880 through a bank. He obtained a Land Title Certificate and built up to lintel level, but after traveling returned to find the structure demolished and the land walled and later redeveloped. Alleging breach of implied covenants under Section 22 of the Conveyancing Act, he sought a refund and damages from both the bank and the developer. The Court held the bank acted only as agent and dropped out of the transaction, and the developer had valid registered title; the plaintiffs own title subsisted, and no defect or covenant breach was proved. Quiet enjoyment is qualified and no interference by the covenantor was shown. The Unilever case was distinguished because title there had not passed. The plaintiff admitted he bore responsibility to protect his land but failed to act. The appeal was dismissed and costs of GH20,000 were awarded to the Defendants.