OFORI AGYEKUM v. MADAM AKUA BIO (DEC’D)
January 31, 2014
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
- E. K. AYEBI J.A. (PRESIDING)
- IRENE C. DANQUAH J.A.
- TANKO I. O. AMADU J.A.
January 31, 2014
COURT OF APPEAL
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
AYEBI J. A.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff against the judgment of a Kumasi Circuit Court delivered on 18th March 2010. The subject-matter of the suit is H/No. 11C Blk F Mamponteng.
The claim of the plaintiff at the trial court is for:
(i) A declaration that H/No. 11C Blk F, Mamponteng-Ashanti was the self-acquired property of Opanin Yaw Manu (deceased).
ii) A declaration that the distribution of H/No. plot 11C Block F Mamponteng, Ashanti as well as the intestate estate of the late Opanin Yaw Manu is governed by the Intestate Succession Law (PNDC Law 111).
iii) Damages for trespass(iv) An order for accounts(v) Recovery of possession(vi) Perpetual injunction restraining the defendant by herself, her agents, servants and workmen or any other persons claiming through or by her from in any manner interfering with the subject-matter.
Defendant on her part in a statement of defence filed, counter-claimed for: (a)A declaration that Plot No. 11 Block F is the family property of the defendant.
b)Ejectment of the children and the recovery of the rooms being occupied by any of the children of the late Yaw Manu.
c)General damages.
d)Perpetual injunction to restrain the plaintiff and his siblings, successors and indeed anybody claiming through him from in any way dealing or interfering with the house in dispute.
In this judgment I will refer to the parties as they were known at the trial court.
The plaintiff is the son of the late Opanin Yaw Manu.
He sued the defendant Akua Bio as the customary successor of his late father.
The plaintiff’s case is that his late father built H/No. E. B. 26 renumbered H/No. Plot 11C Blk F, Mamponteng, Ashanti.
Opanin Yaw Manu, plaintiff said acquired the plot of land from Nana Kofi Owusu, the then Manpontenghene.
Originally, Yaw Manu from his own resources as a trader built a swish house nicknamed “Attakwame” house on the land.
The house was numbered E. B. 26. Let me say that swish house technology was introduced into this country by migrants from Atakpame, in the former Republic of Dahomey, now the Republic of Benin.
So the proper nickname of the swish house is “Atakpame” house and not “Attakwame” house.
According to the plaintiff, his father went to Benimase in the Konongo District to seek greener pastures.
On his return, he pulled down the swish house and put up a fourteen bedroom sandcrete house.
The house number was later changed to Plot 11C Blk F. Until his death on 22nd July 2001, his father lived in the ho
AI Generated Summary
On appeal from the Kumasi Circuit Court, the Court of Appeal considered a dispute over H/No. 11C Block F, Mamponteng, between the plaintiff (son of the late Opanin Yaw Manu) and the defendant (his aunt, Akua Bio, sued as customary successor). The Circuit Court had dismissed the plaintiff’s claims and accepted the defendant’s counterclaim that the house was family property built by her uncles. The appellate court re-evaluated the record, emphasizing evidentiary standards and the weight accorded to documentary proof. A site plan (Exhibit B) endorsed by traditional authorities named Yaw Manu as owner of EB 26, and property rate/conservancy receipts in his name, combined with long occupation, established a rebuttable presumption of ownership that the defendant failed to overcome. Applying principles on traditional evidence versus recent acts and clarifying that allocation papers are non-registrable and preliminary, the court found the preponderance of probabilities favored the plaintiff, allowed the appeal, declared the property self-acquired, held PNDC Law 111 governs distribution, and granted possession and a perpetual injunction while refusing damages and accounting due to lack of proof.