Try asking the following...
Try asking the following...
May 11, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Counsel for the Applicant is praying this Court to stay proceeding on ground that they have appealed a ruling of this Court which they alleged their application before the Court for an order striking out the instant suit for non-compliance with mandatory provisions of law was not moved when the Court gave its ruling.
The Plaintiff is opposed to same and prays that the instant application should be dismissed and that even if they win their application they will come back and move their application and it will not affect the matter before the Court.
Counsel prays that they are allowed to move their application while they wait for the outcome of their application.
The application that this instant Applicant is appealing on has to do with striking out of this instant suit.
Even though the appeal is not about the ruling of the Court but on the grounds that the application was not moved when the Court came out with its ruling.
This Honourable Court is of the view that it will be just to stay the proceedings of this Court as should the Applicant succeed in their appeal they will have to move their application to strike out the suit again.
For the application for injunction pending before the Court, since the processes have been served on them, it will be prudent for all parties to stay put until the said application is moved.
Thus, the instant application is granted as prayed.
No order as to costs.
SGD)H/L PRISCILLA DAPAAH MIREKU (MRS. )(JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT).
AI Generated Summary
In the High Court presided over by Justice Priscilla Dapaah Mireku, the Applicant sought a stay of proceedings on the basis that it had appealed a ruling of the same court. The appeal challenges a procedural irregularity: the Applicant contends its application to strike out the suit for alleged non-compliance with mandatory legal provisions had not been moved when the Court issued its ruling. The Plaintiff opposed the stay, urging dismissal and maintaining that any eventual success on appeal would merely lead the Applicant to return and move the strike-out application without affecting the substance of the suit. Considering the pending application for injunction, for which process had been served, the Court concluded it was just and prudent to stay proceedings, grant the application as prayed, and make no order as to costs.