Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
By the amended writ of summons, Plaintiff sued defendants jointly and severally for the following reliefs:
A. Declaration of title in No. 4 School Street, Teshie- Nungua Estate originally covering 3.06 acres by her indenture but found to cover 3.11 acres by surveyors of Land Title Registry
B. An order for recovery of possession of all that piece of land identified as No. 4 School Street by the document given to her by the 1st Defendant’s predecessor
C. An order to cancel the documents of Defendants or setting aside of same
D. An order for perpetual injunction restraining the Defendants, their agents, assigns and all who claim through them from in any way or means interfering with the Plaintiff’s quiet enjoyment of the said land and development of the same upon the satisfaction of the court’s subsisting order on the 1st Defendant
E. Special damages of GH¢4 million against the Defendants for the unnecessary mental agony, physical suffering in the form of loss of uncalculated time spent both on the land to prove her title to the 2nd, 3rd and 4th Defendants and at the Police Station even at the expense of going to court to represent fee-paying clients as counsel
F. General damages for trespass
G. An order to 1st Defendant to pay for Plaintiff’s new drawings to be charged by her architect Mr. Fritz Andoh in respect of the ones earlier sent to him for onward transmission to City Engineers Department for approval
H. Costs.
Plaintiff pleaded that she acquired the disputed land from the then State Housing Corporation now State Housing Company Limited (1st defendant) herein in 1986 for her to develop a school.
Plaintiff claims she immediately after the acquisition went into possession by walling the land.
She also built one room structure for a caretaker to stay on the land.
It was further alleged that because of certain challenges that Plaintiff attributed the cause thereof to 1st Defendant Plaintiff could not develop the school.
Plaintiff took 1st Defendant to Court in Suit No. BMC 735/2006 and the Court on 25/4/2012 ordered 1st Defendant to provide access to the land by providing roads, drainage and any other necessary infrastructure on the land to facilitate the construction of the school.
Plaintiff averred further that before judgment in that case could be delivered on March 2012, she noticed that her possessory rights over the land were being violated by 4th Defendant.
It turned out that the actual trespasser was 2nd Defendant who asserted his r