MORGAN KWAME OPOKU v. AKOSUA OSAA
January 18, 2023
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- PROF. KOTEY JSC (PRESIDING)
- OWUSU (MS.) JSC
- AMADU JSC
- PROF. MENSA-BONSU (MRS.) JSC
- KULENDI JSC
January 18, 2023
SUPREME COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
OWUSU (MS.) JSC:-
On 21st March, 2019, the Court of Appeal, Accra, in a unanimous decision dismissed the Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant (hereinafter referred to as Plaintiff’s) appeal against the Defendant/Respondent/Respondent (hereinafter referred to as Defendant) and affirmed the Judgment of the Trial Court as follows:
“Upon the facts and analysis of the evidence, the only reasonable conclusion is that the appellant’s grantor sat by, saw the respondent enter the land in 1984 and acquiesced in her spending money and labour to develop it without challenge.
The appellant’s right of action first accrued to his grantor through whom he derives his title. Thus, his explanation that he had been away and did not know of the encroachment, and that he has registered his document cannot avail him.
I will hold on the authority of VANDERPUYE vs. GOLIGHTLY & ORS. [1965] GLR 453 SC that the appellant’s grantor Dauda and thus the appellant was estopped through the grantor’s acquiescence from asserting his rights because after the respondent had acquired the land in good faith in 1984, Dauda stood by for over 15 years while the respondent incurred expenditure in developing the land. They are deemed to have waived their right….
It is for the above reasons that the appeal of the plaintiff/appellant fails in its entirety and is dismissed.
The Judgment of the trial Court is affirmed in favour of the defendant/respondent, but on grounds of laches and acquiescence on the part of the plaintiff/appellant’s grantor from whom the plaintiff/appellant derived his title”.
Dissatisfied with the decision of the Court of Appeal, the plaintiff mounted this appeal before the Supreme Court on the following grounds;
a.Both the Court of Appeal and the High Court were wrong in law when they dismissed the Plaintiff/Appellant/Appellant’s case.
b.The Judgment of both the Court of Appeal and the High Court were all against the weight of evidence.
c.Additional grounds of appeal shall be filed upon the receipt of the Certified True Copy of the Ruling.
It is noted for the record that, no additional ground was filed.
The relief being sought from the Supreme Court:
To reverse/set aside the decision of the Court of Appeal, Accra and all the consequential orders dated the 21st Day of March, 2019.
Before dealing with the arguments advanced in support and against the appeal, we will give a brief background of the case.
The plaintiff instituted this action at the High Court, Accra for,
1.A
AI Generated Summary
This Supreme Court of Ghana decision resolves a protracted land dispute over Parcel No. 709, Block 17, Section 218 at Odorkor, Accra. The plaintiff claimed title through an assignment from Dauda Larbi Laryea, supported by Land Title Certificate No. GA 30572. The 1st Defendant had occupied and developed the land since 1986, first acquiring from the Charbukwei family of Anyaa in 1984 and re-purchasing in 2004 from the Gbawe Kwatei Quartey family after they were adjudged owners. The High Court dismissed the plaintiff’s claims (and rejected the 2nd Defendant Augustina Akyea Boakye’s counterclaim), initially invoking Act 2 to protect the 1st Defendant. The Court of Appeal affirmed dismissal but held Act 2 unpleaded, instead relying on laches and acquiescence. On further appeal, Justice M. Owusu (MS.) JSC, writing for a unanimous panel including Prof. N.A. Kotey, I.O. Tanko Amadu, Prof. H.J.A.N. Mensa-Bonsu (MRS.), and E.Y. Kulendi, struck out a vague ground, rejected procedural-nullity claims, found no weight-of-evidence error, and affirmed the Court of Appeal, emphasizing special pleas must be pleaded and that long, undisturbed possession with the claimant’s acquiescence defeats relief.