MARY ABDULAI v. MR. CUDJOE AND AGONA EAST DISTRICT ASSEMBLY
April 26, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HIS HON. JONATHAN DESMOND NUNOO ESQ
Areas of Law
- Tort Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
April 26, 2023
CIRCUIT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGEMENT
The Plaintiff is seeking the following reliefs.
a. A declaration that the 1st defendant is not entitled to keep his building in such a
manner as to turn the rain water falling therein onto Plaintiff’s dwelling house.2
b. A declaration that the 1st defendant is not entitled to keep his building in such a
manner as to infringe on Plaintiff’s right of way.
c. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the 1st defendant by himself, his
agents, assigns privies workmen etc. from continuing to maintain the poultry farm
and keep his said building and other structures so as to be nuisance to the Plaintiff.
d. An order directed at the 1st defendant to demolish any structure or building which
is a source of nuisance to the Plaintiff.
e. An order of perpetual injunction restraining the 2nd defendant from issuing a
building permit to the 1st defendant in respect of the building complained of.
f. Damages for nuisance against the 1st defendant.
g. Damages for negligence against the 2nd defendant.
In the statement of claim the allegation of plaintiff which are essential to the claim are as
follows:
5. For some time now the present, the 1st Defendant constantly caused offensive and
pestilential smells to come onto and be on and about Plaintiff’s said dwelling house.
6. The said smells and vapours are caused and come from a poultry farm erected by the
1st Defendant on his premises knowing very well that the neighborhood is a residential
area.
7. The birds from the poultry farm of the 1st Defendant are made to stray during the
daytime and they come onto the dwelling house of the Plaintiff and defecate all over the
dwelling house creating an eyesore.
8. The nuisance had steadily continued ever since and it especially objectionable anytime
it rains.
9. Furthermore, in or about the year 2018, the 1st Defendant commenced the construction
of a story building on portion of his land. The said structure is so built that the eastern3
portion thereof abuts the western portion of Plaintiff’s wall and the distance between the
two erections is so narrow that criminals can easily scale over plaintiff’s wall and come
into her dwelling house.
10. Again the gable of 1st Defendant’s building has been slopped towards Plaintiff’s
dwelling house and when the said building is eventually roofed, rain falling on the roof
would flow on to Plaintiff’s dwelling house no matter what.
11. Not only that, 1st Defendant’s building has covered portions o
AI Generated Summary
In a neighbour dispute from Kotokoli Zongo, the Plaintiff sought declarations, injunctions, demolition orders, and damages against her neighbour (the 1st Defendant) and the local authority (the 2nd Defendant). She alleged the 1st Defendants poultry farm emitted noxious smells, birds strayed and fouled her premises, his under-construction storey building blocked her access road and would channel rainwater onto her property, and the 2nd Defendant negligently permitted unauthorized building. The 1st Defendant described two plots, with a residence on one and a poultry operation on the other, admitted initially building without a permit but claimed later approval and confinement of birds. The Court appointed a surveyor who measured separations of about 4.21 feet (coop) and 5.23 feet (building) from the Plaintiffs wall, and the expert noted no problem with the coop. Applying the Evidence Acts burden of proof standards and nuisance principles centered on reasonableness and locality, the Court found the Plaintiffs proof inadequate, her rainwater claim conjectural, and presumed regularity of the Assemblys permitting. All reliefs were dismissed and costs of GHC10,000 were awarded against the Plaintiff.