MAD. ADJOA AKYERE AND MRS. MARY WHITE v. KOJO AMISSAH
May 16, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER WORSHIP, JULIANA S.P. MENSAH, ESQ
Areas of Law
- Property and Real Estate Law
- Evidence Law
May 16, 2023
DISTRICT COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
JUDGMENT
SUMMARY
On 3rd November, 2022 this court adopted proceedings and continued the trial of this case
which commenced on 6th February 2020 under my predecessor.
The Plaintiffs, by an amended Writ of Summons, are claiming against Defendant
1. A declaration of title and ownership to a piece or parcel of land situate, being and
lying at a place commonly known and called “Bobman Hotel”, at Abura Dunkwa
in the Abura Asebu Kwamankese District and sharing boundaries with the lands
belonging to Nana Afariwaa Nyarkoh II’s land, Kojo Mensah, Kofi Abban and one
Kow Frimpong;
2. Damages for trespass;
3. Perpetual injunction restraining the defendant, his assigns, workmen, servants or
anybody claiming through him from interfering with or carrying out any
development on the land in dispute;
4. Cost involved in the prosecution of the suit,
5. Any other relief(s) that this honourable court may deem fit to order under the
circumstances of the present case.
The Defendant pleaded not liable to all the reliefs.
PLAINTIFF’S CASE
The 1st and 2nd plaintiffs are a mother and daughter. Defendant is 1
st Plaintiff’s nephew.
It is 1st Plaintiff’s case that the land in dispute forms part of a larger portion of land which
her late mother shared among her children.
1st Plaintiff avers that she caused a portion of the disputed land to be demarcated for the
2nd Plaintiff and one Samuel Arthur. 2nd Plaintiff deposited on her land blocks and a heap
of sand. Samuel also deposited a heap of sand and a pile of stones on the land and erected
boundary pillars.
Plaintiff avers that before the demarcations for the two persons, she cultivated oranges
interspersed with cassava and maize.
It is Plaintiff’s claim that Defendant has trespassed onto Plaintiff’s portion of land given to
2nd Plaintiff and Samuel and has started constructing a building foundation.
DEFENDANT’S CASE
Defendant denies that the land in dispute shares boundaries with Nana Afariwa Nyarko
II’s and contends that the land lies at a place known as “Asokwa”.
He avers that the disputed land forms part of a large tract of land allocated to three
paternal and maternal siblings named as Efua Nyarko II, Adjoa Nyantakyiwa and Thomas
Kwesi Adu Fabin.
Defendant avers that his mother was Adjoa Nyantekyiwaa. Efua Nayarko II and Thomas
Adu Gyamfi Fabin were his maternal aunt and uncle.
Defendant contends Plaintiff clandestinely sold the disputed land to Samuel Arthur but
Defendant warned Mr. Art
AI Generated Summary
This District Magistrate’s judgment concerns a family land dispute in Abura Dunkwa, Ghana. 1st plaintiff and her daughter claimed title, trespass damages, and injunction over a plot near “Bobman Hotel,” asserting it formed part of land inherited from their mother, Ama Pentsiwaa, and had been demarcated for 2nd plaintiff and for Samuel Arthur. The defendant, 1st plaintiff’s nephew, argued the land lies at “Asokwa” and forms part of a tract allocated to Abena Duma’s children, including his mother, Adjoa Nyantakyiwa, and his uncle, Thomas Fabin; he said he worked and began building there to deter encroachers. After hearing witnesses, including PW1 Kojo Mensah (regent of Abura Dunkwa), the court found plaintiffs’ evidence inconsistent and uncorroborated—particularly boundary positions and possession—while defense testimony was materially corroborated. Applying the Evidence Act and authorities on burden, boundaries, and corroboration, the court held plaintiffs failed to prove the land was part of Ama Pentsiwaa’s estate, dismissed the suit, and awarded GH₵7,000 costs to the defendant.