KOFI ADJEI-DADZIE & ANOR vs TELEFONIKA GHANA LIMITED & ORS
May 9, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
- HER LADYSHIP JUSTICE ANANDA J. AIKINS (MRS) JUSTICE OF THE HIGH COURT.
Areas of Law
- Employment Law
- Contract Law
May 9, 2023
HIGH COURT
GHANA
CORAM
Try asking the following...
INTRODUCTION
Per their amended writ of summons and statement of claim filed on the 7th day of August, 2019, the plaintiffs sought the following reliefs against the defendant: -
a) A declaration that the purported termination of the plaintiffs’ contract of employment is unlawful, unfair and without basis.
b) An order for the payment to plaintiffs of their full salaries, increments and all other benefits from the date of their purported dismissal till date of judgment.
c) An order for the payment of plaintiffs’ social security contributions from the date of their employment till final judgment.
d) General damages for wrongful dismissal.
e) An order for the payment of the amount of GH¢4, 000 to the 1st plaintiff.
f)Legal cost. The defendant denied liability for the claims of the plaintiff and at the close of pleadings the following issues inclusive of additional ones filed by the defendant were set down by the court for determination: -
Whether or not the purported termination of the plaintiffs’ contract of employment is unlawful, unfair and without basis?
Whether or not the plaintiffs are entitled to the payment of their full salaries, increments and all other benefits from date of their purported dismissal till date of judgment?
Whether or not the plaintiffs are entitled to their reliefs endorsed on their writ of summons?
Whether or not the 1st plaintiff paid an amount of GH¢4, 000 on admission of stealing?
Whether or not the amount of GH¢4, 000 was paid under duress?
CASE OF PLAINTIFFS
The plaintiffs said that they were employees of the defendant till on or about August, 2016 when they were arrested by the police, charged with and prosecuted for the offences of conspiracy and stealing of a Samsung galaxy Note 7 phone belonging to the defendant (their employer). According to the plaintiffs, the 1st plaintiff was employed by the defendant on 15th June, 2015 and the 2nd defendant was employed in the year 2006, also in the month of June.
In the year 2016 the plaintiffs were arraigned by the police before the District Court, Accra Central on a complaint lodged against the plaintiffs by the defendant.
They were charged with conspiring to steal and stealing a galaxy note 7 Samsung mobile Phone.
After the trial before the District Court.
They were both acquitted and discharged by the trial court.
The plaintiffs claimed that after their acquittal and discharge they wrote to the defendant requesting to resume work but the defendant
AI Generated Summary
This Ghana High Court judgment by Her Ladyship Justice Ananda J. Aikins concerns wrongful termination arising after the defendant reported a missing Samsung Galaxy Note 7 and two employees were charged at the District Court, Accra Central. Both were acquitted and discharged. After acquittal, they sought reinstatement, but the defendant terminated their employment through its lawyer. Only the 1st plaintiff proceeded at trial. The court held that Clause 5 of the appointment letter required one month’s notice or salary in lieu, and Exhibit D showed no notice and no payment, breaching the contract. Common law permits termination only with notice or pay in lieu, and the defendant failed to prove any misconduct under Labour Act section 15(e)(iii). The court denied full back pay due to mitigation, awarding GH12,000 (12 months’ salary) in damages, ordering a refund of GH4,000 (paid at the police station) with interest from August 2016, and awarding GH5,000 costs to the 1st plaintiff.